Peer review<

Peer review< - CompWisdom

Meaningful results bit by bit

About us | Why use us? | Press | Contact us

Topic: Peer review<

Ads by Google



<bb>>Peerb>bb>> review - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

<bb>>Peerb>bb>> review, in scientific journals, assumes that the article reviewed has been honestly written, and the process is not designed to detect fraud.
<bb>>Peerb>bb>> review (known as refereeing in some academic fields) is a scholarly process used in the publication of manuscripts and in the awarding of funding for research.
<bb>>Peerb>bb>> review subjects an author's work or ideas to the scrutiny of one or more others who are experts in the field.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer_review



Code Review Protocol

If the code is complex the leader may choose to have a half hour informational session some time before the actual <bb>>peerb>bb>> review session where the author of the code provides a high level detail or the code and is available for questions.
A <bb>>Peerb>bb>> Code Review Plan should be developed and documented in the Software Development Plan for a project.
Optional reviewers are selected to participate in the review session because of their knowledge of the subject matter or expertise in the type of code to be reviewed.

http://usfweb2.usf.edu/ora_ban/pdprocess/codereview/codereviewpolicy.html (1345 words)



Smart Bear Software

Whether you're interested in efficient, effective <bb>>peerb>bb>> code reviews, software metrics reporting, or change analysis, our software will save you time and make your processes more accurate, repeatable, and reportable.
CodeCollaborator enables <bb>>peerb>bb>> review of source code changes before or after files are checked into version control.
"Code Reviewer enables software engineering managers to reduce the amount of time spent on reviewing code resulting in a more streamlined development process."

http://www.codehistorian.com (212 words)



Code Reviewer

Everyone agrees that <bb>>peerb>bb>> code review uncovers bugs, makes code more standard and maintainable, and promotes learning and sharing.
Reviewers usually don't verify that problems were fixed.
"Code Reviewer enables software engineering managers to reduce the amount of time spent on reviewing code resulting in a more streamlined development process."

http://www.codehistorian.com/codereviewer-overview.php (196 words)



Nupedia: Join the Effort!

Editors will have the valuable assistance of a potentially large group of <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewers (see below); hence, an editor's direct assistance in the difficult process of writing and critically evaluating incomplete work can be kept to a minimum.
You will be participating in creating possibly one of the most powerful open source software systems for <bb>>peerb>bb>> review processes.
<bb>>Peerb>bb>> reviewers will be part of moderated discussion lists (called "review groups") to which prospective articles on a given subject are posted -- anonymously, if desired.

http://nupedia.8media.org/join.shtml (1701 words)



<bb>>Peerb>bb>>-Review

Whether it appears in print, a combination of print and electronic forms, or only in electronic form, a <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed journal is one in which each feature article has been examined by people with credentials in the article's field of study before it is published.
Collections of papers from conferences may be considered <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed as well, if the original presentations were "invited" or examined by experts before being accepted.
Nevertheless, <bb>>peerb>bb>> review is the best mechanism we have to attain scholarly objectivity and to guard against scientific fraud.

http://www.valinor.ca/peer-review.html (1701 words)



User talk:Phoenix2/Archive1 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia [Anonymoused]

Also, thanx for the comments at <bb>>peerb>bb>> review about List of rivers by length.
I've got some input on the article already, but we would be happy to see anyone that knows football to review it also.
Yes, I could help with <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewing this article.

anonymouse.org/cgi-bin/anon-www_de.cgi/http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Phoenix2/Archive1 (1701 words)



<bb>>Peerb>bb>>-reviewed journal - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

<bb>>Peerb>bb>>-reviewed journals are generally considered the most reliable academic sources.
A <bb>>peerb>bb>>-reviewed journal is an academic periodical that has some sort of review process to ensure its accuracy.
Sometimes <bb>>peerb>bb>> review does not work as intended.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peer-reviewed_journal (1701 words)



Proxem

To that end, we collaborate with universities, submit papers for <bb>>peerb>bb>> review, and partner with product groups to bring our research to you.
While much research on the hard problem of in-depth story understanding by computer was performed starting in the 1970s, interest shifted in the 1990s to information extraction and word sense disambiguation.
There are now many computer programs for automatically determining the sense of a word in context (Word Sense Disambiguation or WSD).

http://www.proxem.com (1701 words)



TIJ <bb>>Peerb>bb>>-Reviewed Articles: Key Factors Influencing Innovation In Government by Eleanor D. Glor

"Turning Goals into Results: The Power of Catalytic Mechanisms." Harvard Business Review.
She has edited two books, and has published a number of articles on public sector innovation.
Bandura, A. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory.

http://www.innovation.cc/peer-reviewed/factors-of-innovation.htm (1701 words)



ECS EPrints Service - Online Archives for <bb>>Peerb>bb>>-Reviewed Journal Publications

<bb>>Peerb>bb>>-reviewed journals used to perform two functions for research and researchers -- (1) <bb>>peerb>bb>> review and (2) distribution -- and research libraries used to perform two more -- (3) archiving and (4) access provision.
Authors will self-archive their papers, both before and after <bb>>peerb>bb>> review, in their institutional Eprint Archives, which will all be interoperable with one another, providing open access to all <bb>>peerb>bb>>-reviewed research output as if it were all in one global archive.
In the online age, journals will need only to provide the <bb>>peerb>bb>>-review service.

http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/7722 (1701 words)



All Medical Resources

The Journal of Cellular Pathology is a <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed, quarterly publication containing articles on current and new techniques appropriate to cellular pathology in its broadest sense and relevant to hospitals, industrial and research laboratories.
The Current Reports journals were developed out of the recognition that specialists have increasing difficulty keeping up to date with the expanding volume of information published in their fields.
The AJE is the premier epidemiologic journal devoted to the publication of empirical research findings, methodologic developments in the field of epidemiologic research and opinion pieces.

http://www.docguide.com/news/content.nsf/MedicalResourcesWeb?OpenForm&id=48dde4a73e09a969852568880078c249&cond=Medical+journals (1701 words)



John A. Graziano Memorial Library: finding <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed journals

Check the page with editors’ names and subscription information or the page with instructions to authors (either at the beginning or end) for any mention of “<bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed” or “ refered”.
Limiting a search in an electronic database to articles from <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed journals:
A group of professionals from the field, (the author’s peers), review the articles submitted for publication to ensure that the information and research are valid.

http://www.samuelmerritt.edu/library/peer_reviewed_journals.cfm (1701 words)



Online <bb>>peerb>bb>>-reviewed journal articles - EvoWiki

See also free online journals, partially free online journals, and <bb>>peerb>bb>>-reviewed literature search engines.
Quaterly Review of Biology 77: 261-295 (PDF format) (http://www.mcorriss.com/Prum_and_Brush_2002.pdf) - Prum and Brush's opus on the new evo-devo model of feather evolution, including a critique of Jones et al.
(http://www.ncsce.org/PDF_files/alan_essay.pdf) - The latest work from Alan Feduccia, reviewing the current status of opposition to the theropod origin of birds.

http://wiki.cotch.net/index.php/Online_peer-reviewed_journal_articles (1701 words)



Molecular Vision

ision is a <bb>>peerb>bb>>-reviewed journal dedicated to the dissemination of research results in molecular biology, cell biology, and the genetics of the visual system (ocular and cortical).
Molecular Vision has developed improvements in the review and galley processes for electronic publishing?
Molecular Vision's Editorial Review Board is a distinguished panel of 60 scientists?

http://www.molvis.org/molvis (1701 words)



Help - Finding <bb>>Peerb>bb>> Reviewed Journal Articles

A very small number of the Library's journals can be searched by databases which have a filter for "<bb>>Peerb>bb>> Reviewed." At the moment, only the Proquest (ABI/Inform, Proquest newspapers), Ebscohosts Academic Search Elite and the Wilsonweb databases have this filter.
Many of our Library's journals are <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed.
Even though a particular journal is <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed, an individual article in that journal may not be.

http://www.csupomona.edu/~library/html/help_peerreviewed_journalartic.html (1701 words)



<bb>>Peerb>bb>> Reviewed Journals

There are also some <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed journals in the library's ELibrary database.
<bb>>Peerb>bb>> reviewed articles can usually also be identified by their tendency to have lengthy titles, highly technical content, and multiple authors.
A <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed journal is a periodic publication in which the substantive articles are selected by peers of the authors who are submitting their work for publication.

http://www.rrcc.edu/library/articles/prjfaq.htm (1701 words)



A Study of Suppression of Information

Consider, however, that if the peers who review the work of glutamate-industry representatives are themselves glutamate-industry representatives, or very close friends, the work of glutamate industry representatives may very well be published.
When professional <bb>>peerb>bb>> review journals hesitate to take articles from glutamate industry researchers because their studies are badly flawed and those flaws have been pointed out to journal editors, researchers hold seminars and/or present their papers at professional meetings with abstracts printed in appropriate journals (Altman, 1994; Stevenson, 1997).
The fact that these studies are often done at generally respected universities or medical schools, all of which required that the research be approved by medical research review committees, has public relations value.

http://www.truthinlabeling.org/l-manuscript.html (11687 words)



Consumed: The Grey Album

But at the peak of the controversy in late February, searches for tracks from ''The Grey Album'' were rivaling or even topping searches for megastars like OutKast and Norah Jones on the major <bb>>peerb>bb>>-to-<bb>>peerb>bb>> file-sharing services followed by the consulting firm BigChampagne.
TECHNOLOGY; Europe May Tell Microsoft to Split Software (February 25, 2004)
A result was a rare confluence, with some downloaders treating ''The Grey Album'' like post-modern protest music, others interested in hearing a daring musical experiment and still others drawn in by simple curiosity.

http://www.nytimes.com/2004/03/21/magazine/21CONSUMED.html?ex=1395205200&en=9d575bc6d462e9a5&ei=5007&partner=USERLAND (818 words)



Cline Library - <bb>>Peerb>bb>>-Reviewed Journals

Many of the Library's journals are included in databases which have a filter for "<bb>>Peerb>bb>> Reviewed" or “Refereed.” An example is Academic Search Premier.
Short content such as editorials, commentaries, or review (of a book or other article, for example) are not <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed.
In a <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed journal (also known as refereed) drafts of articles are critically assessed by other scholars in the author's field or specialty before they are accepted for publication.

http://www.nau.edu/~cline/information/guides/peer-reviewed.html (818 words)



<bb>>Peerb>bb>> Reviewed Journal Publications:

Maynes, P. McMurtry, J. Klewicki and H. Robey, 1997, "Hydrodynamic Scalings in the Rapid Growth of Crystals From Solution," Journal of Crystal Growth, Vol.
Robey and D. Maynes, 2000, "Numerical Simulation of the Hydrodynamics and Mass Transfer in the Large Scale, Rapid Growth of KDP Crystals.
Maynes "On Rotating Bluff Body Flows," 1997, University of Utah.

http://www.et.byu.edu/~maynesrd/publ.html (818 words)



Occasional Papers of the BSG

All papers are <bb>>peerb>bb>>-reviewed, original research or review papers of relevance to creation biology.
OPBSG is committed to publishing constructive scientific research in creation biology.

http://www.bryancore.org/bsg/opbsg (818 words)



First Monday: The Idea

First Monday was born in the summer of 1995 in a proposal by Chief Editor Edward J. Valauskas to the Danish publisher Munksgaard, to start a new Internet–only, <bb>>peerb>bb>>–review journal about the Internet.
Since its start in May 1996, First Monday has published 570 papers in 103 issues; these papers were written by 678 different authors.
In October 1995, Valauskas, Dyson, and Anders Geersten, then Vice President of Journals for Munksgaard, met in Copenhagen, to discuss operational and other aspects about the journal.

http://www.firstmonday.dk/idea.html (818 words)



The Journal of Electronic Publishing

Rob Kling, Lisa Spector, and Geoff McKim say that <bb>>peerb>bb>> review is not the only way to judge the value of a scholarly article, and they show another model that is working quite well, thank you, under our very noses.
Bevi Chagnon, a publishing consultant, compares five of the best desktop-publishing packages -- Adobe PageMaker, Adobe InDesign, QuarkXPress, Adobe FrameMaker, and Corel VENTURA -- reviewing their strengths and weaknesses, and suggesting which types of publications they're best suited for.
Genevieve Brown and Beverly J. Irby started the Advancing Women in Leadership Journal, the first international online journal for professional women, and learned a lot of lessons that are useful to all online publishers -- but especially those who are trying to break into new interdisciplinary areas while hewing to traditional approaches to scholarship.

http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/ (818 words)



Social Work Library: <bb>>Peerb>bb>>-Reviewed Journal vs. Magazine

Below are the general features or characteristics which define a <bb>>peerb>bb>>-reviewed journal and a popular magazine.
Reviewed by referees and/or editorial board of experts (the authors' "peers")
Articles provide bibliographic references and usually follow a specific format (article abstract, research background and literature review, methodology, research results, areas for further study, conclusion)

http://www.lib.umich.edu/socwork/rescue/jvsm.html (818 words)



<<bb>>Peerb>bb>> Reviewed Journal Articles in Psychology>

The final results will be review articles published within the last six months on the topic of Alzheimer's.
• Use the electronic journal finder located in the "find an article" section of the USF Libraries web site.
Indexes articles in more than 1,300 journals as well as relevant books and book chapters.

http://www.nelson.usf.edu/reference/peerpsych.html (818 words)



GERG <bb>>Peerb>bb>>-Reviewed Publications

Semi-Annual Review Meeting, TAMU Integrated Reservoir Investigations Group (IRIG), 26 February, Houston, TX.
Sassen, R. Sea floor seeps and the framework of oil generation and migration in the Gulf of Mexico slope: AAPG Hedberg Research Conference, Integration of Geologic Models for Understanding Risk in the Gulf of Mexico, AAPG DataPages Discovery Series 1, 2 p.
The Mussel Watch Approach and Its Applicability to Global Chemical Contamination Monitoring Programmes, International Journal of Environment and Pollution.

http://www.gerg.tamu.edu/menu_publication/publications.htm (818 words)



<bb>>Peerb>bb>> Review - Group 3

Likewise, we want to ensure in our own class that when we do our <bb>>peerb>bb>> review sessions in two weeks, well all be on the same proverbial page, focused on the same issues, and be able to see each others essays through the same lens.
After evaluating all 4 essays on you own, work together as a group to agree on both the strengths and weakness of each essay, making suggestions about how to strengthen the weak area(s).
The typical scenario is that a group of people (who are going to be reading essays written by students from the same course, e.g.

http://hyper.vcsun.org/HyperNews/jbashforth/get/ENGL155/Fall05/PeerReviewGroup3-Oct22.html (549 words)



Cogprints - Year: 1996

Harnad, Stevan (1996) Implementing <bb>>Peerb>bb>> Review on the Net: Scientific Quality Control in Scholarly Electronic Journals.
Karov, Yael and Edelman, Shimon (1996) Similarity-based Word Sense Disambiguation.
This list was generated on Tue Sep 20 08:43:28 BST 2005.

http://cogprints.org/view/year/1996.html (549 words)



Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness Center

This includes the incorrect claims that intelligent design postulates a supernatural creator, that it has produced no <bb>>peerb>bb>> reviewed literature, or that the Pandas textbook offers religious explanations.
A Review and Evaluation of Mark Perakh's Unintelligent Design by Scott Uminsky
The Intelligent Design and Evolution Awareness (IDEA) Center is a 501 (c)(3) non-profit organization dedicated to promoting intelligent design theory and fostering good - spirited discussion and a better understanding over intelligent design theory and the creation - evolution issue among students, educators, churches, and anyone else interested.

http://www.ideacenter.org (242 words)

About us | Why use us? | Press | Contact us

Copyright © 2006 CompWisdom.com Usage implies agreement with terms.

Topic: <b>Peer</b> <b>review<

Ads by Google