386BSD - CompWisdom
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: 386BSD



  
 386BSD - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
386BSD was written mainly by Berkeley alumni Lynne Jolitz (B.S Physics) and William Jolitz (B.S. Computer Science).
386BSD, also known as JOLIX, is a free operating system produced from the BSD derived UNIX operating systems for the Intel 80386.
William Jolitz had considerable experience with prior BSD releases while at the University of California at Berkeley (2.8BSD, 2.9BSD) and William Jolitz and Lynne Jolitz contributed code to Berkeley developed at Symmetric Computer Systems during the 1980's.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/386BSD

  
 William & Lynne's Excellent Operating System - 386BSD
William and Lynne Jolitz were inspired to work on 386BSD by the experience with Symmetric Computer Systems (see "William Jolitz and Symmetric Computer Systems") and the uses of BSD on a ubiquitous platform it inspired.
386BSD was not intended as an omnibus project to "hack Berkeley Unix with", but to refine operating systems concepts.
Early on, many contributions and effort was pushed to "explode" rather than reduce complexity, often without justification other than "that's the way we do it".
http://jolitz.telemuse.net/386bsd

  
 [No title]
The purpose of the 386BSD project remains the same: so students, faculty, staff, and researchers can use BSD on a simple and inexpensive platform.
It was quite a chore for us to continually revise and improve 386BSD while updating it to match the new work done by CSRG and other UCB staff.
So, in making a break with the past, I paused in my series of 386BSD porting articles, took the unencumbered but incomplete NET/2 kernel available from UC Berkeley, and fin- ished the missing pieces necessary to make a bootable run- ning kernel that provides a self-supporting development environment.
http://www.dnull.com/bsd/others/26.txt

  
 Why FreeBSD
386BSD was never meant to do much except suggest which UNIX should go on the Intel chip.
The 386BSD project came into being in 1985 as an attempt to get BSD UNIX to run on an Intel chip.
We might take comfort in the fact that even a luminary as exalted as Bill Joy was dismissing the Mac in the mid-1980s as a machine no one in the UNIX world cared about.
http://www-128.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/library/os-freebsd?ca=dgr-lnxw06FreeBSD

  
 [No title]
The srcdist is the source code for 386bsd, along with all of the header files not included in the bindist.
Another excellent reference book for 386bsd is "The Design and Implementation of the 4.3BSD UNIX Operating system" by Samuel J. Leffler, Marshall Kirk McKusick, Michael J. Karels, John S. Quarterman, 1989, Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-06196-1.
In addition, many people are involved in a project to put together a 386bsd version (FreeBSD) which will be a complete distribution set including all relevant patches and updates to new versions of many of the software packages that are currently available.
http://kiarchive.relcom.ru/pub/internet/faq/386bsd-faq

  
 386BSD R1.0 Reference CD-ROM: Memory Objects
Detailed discussion of the design, trade-offs, and implementation of the 386BSD machine-independent code which implements management of memory objects for the virtual memory system.
http://jolitz.telemuse.net/pubs/e1994_11o/item

  
 Meta - An Interview with Linus Torvalds
A long release cycle is the way to go in a controlled environment (i.e., commercial development), but I think it hurts the "free" development that results from a lot of unconnected persons having access to sources and doing lots of modification.
William and Lynn Jolitz developed 386BSD first, but due to conflicting visions and a closed development process, 386BSD has not been updated in a long time.
The NetBSD project may be a step in the right direction, but I think 386BSD has been hurt by the way it has been developed.
http://www.abc.se/~m9339/linux/linuxdoc/linus.html

  
 [No title]
NetBSD would not be possible were it not for the work of the UCB Computer Systems Research Group, which released Net/2, or the work of William and Lynne Jolitz, who brought 386BSD into the world, or the work of the thousands of contributors to Net/2 and 386BSD.
In addition, many programs in UCB's second BSD Networking Software Release which were missing from 386BSD have been integrated into NetBSD, some of the changes from the upcoming 0.2.3 patch kit have been included, and many local additions and bug fixes have been performed.
Please include your system configuration, and any other relevant information in your bug report.
http://wolfram.schneider.org/bsd/ftp/releases/NetBSD-0.8

  
 The Strength of BSD
Further, at the time, it was believed by many that the BSDI distribution would probably be of a higher quality since professional developers were employed to maintain the code.
Though FreeBSD has been ported to the Alpha processor, it is primarily focused on developing a highly optimized version of BSD for the Intel/AMD platform.
Others soon took up the mantel and over the next several years, five interrelated BSD-based distributions were spawned each generally focusing different goals: BSDI, NetBSD, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and finally Darwin/Mac OS Berkeley Software Design, Incorporated (BSDI) was a company and a distribution dedicated to the more commercial aspects of BSD.
http://networking.ringofsaturn.com/Unix/bsd.php

  
 The FreeBSD Diary -- Why is Linux Successful? - An Opinion.
The BSD systems distribute a full system source tree, in that they maintain a large proportion of a full system so when you do a build you make a large proportion of your unix system.
Both NetBSD and FreeBSD moved to being based entirely on the 4.4lite code base, NetBSD with version 1.0 and version 2.0 for FreeBSD (by then 386BSD was a dead system, OpenBSD split well after this).
As part of the resolution the 4.4lite code base was given a clean bill of health by Novell.
http://www.freebsddiary.org/linux.php

  
 theage.com.au - The Age
I believe this is because we did carefully maintain a policy of careful review, testing, and control, and kept our focus on continuing the Berkeley Software Distribution tradition of quality research we had learned while at UC Berkeley.
However, we had a responsibility to the magazine, the readers, and the users of 386BSD to provide the best environment we could, in the original Berkeley tradition.
Sadly, this work was more resented than admired precisely because it was different than what had been done before.
http://www.theage.com.au/technology/itnews/yoursay/2003/05/22

  
 Salon The unknown hackers
Not many Linux-come-latelies know this, but Linux was actually the second open-source Unix-based operating system for personal computers to be distributed over the Internet.
But somehow, in the 18 months between 0.1 and 1.0, the project lost its momentum.
Like its predecessor, 386BSD Release 0.0, Release 0.1 comprises an entire and complete UNIX-like operating system for the 80386/80486-based AT Personal Computer."
http://archive.salon.com/tech/feature/2000/05/17/386bsd/print.html

  
 frequently_asked()
* 386BSD followed the University of California's process for development.
* 386BSD comes from university projects and memory of
* What was 386BSD development process and why was this critical?
http://www.386bsd.org/faq

  
 Daemon News
I remember first downloading 386BSD 0.1, the first usable open-source port of the BSD tapes to the Intel architecture.
386BSD, in it's early years, had far more users than Linux, and a far more mature base to work from.
(In contrast, 386BSD needed patches for X support, which came very early on, and handled basic networking from the word go.) 386BSD had everything going for it, bar the very closed, secretive, slow nature of the releases, and Linux had nothing but a few devices.
http://bsdnews.com/view_comments.php3?story_id=806&thread=1212

  
 Alternative Operating Systems
Our original goal was to produce an intermediate snapshot of 386BSD in order to fix a number of problems with it that the patchkit mechanism just was not capable of solving.
This was based on the 4.3BSD-Lite (``Net/2'') tape from U.C. Berkeley, with many components also provided by 386BSD and the Free Software Foundation.
The first CDROM (and general net-wide) distribution was FreeBSD 1.0, released in December of 1993.
http://www.wiegand.org/freebsd_info.php

  
 netbsd-advocacy: Re: Why did NetBSD and FreeBSD diverge?
Mar 1992: Bill Jolitz releases the first alpha version (0.0) of his free operating system, 386BSD.
It was a disaster, no support was forthcoming, and the documentation was in a proprietary Microsoft format.
14 July: Bill Jolitz releases version 0.1 of 386BSD.
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/netbsd-advocacy/2001/01/18/0017.html

  
 386BSD - FOLDOC Definition
An unofficial patchkit, available from many anonymous FTP archives, solves many of the problems associated with 386BSD Version 0.1.
In addition, many common Unix packages have been ported.
William Jolitz played a key rôle and there have been many contributors.
http://www.nightflight.com/foldoc-bin/foldoc.cgi?386BSD

  
 386BSD Design Notes
386BSD has many interesting design features that address many challenges faced by advanced operating system.
These videos help draw your attention to them.
William Jolitz and Lynne Jolitz, the authors of 386bsd, speak on what makes it different.
http://minutepitch.valux.com/386bsddesign

  
 199503: BSD-based OS Releases (Part 1)
Like the 386BSD collection, BSD/OS releases are proprietary, but contain pieces of redistributable code.
Although the CD-ROM contains a bootable operating system for Intel CPUs, it is being released as a research tool, not as a commercial OS.
The files are hyperlinked with a global glossary and index to illustrate the structure and interdependence in the discussion of the system files.
http://www.cfcl.com/tin/P/199503.shtml

  
 USENET News article: [386bsd] Error Theory
No, but to work in all efficency the CPU must have a Hardware & Software ERROR Bit.
This tells us that real time single operator Operating Systems have recognition of what we need to do.
Keywords: Error theory device driver computer theory Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1993 09:11:58 GMT Lines: 135 The following is message I sent to William Jolitz a while back.
http://www.dmst.aueb.gr/dds/news/115.html

  
 Jolix - where to get things from Jolitz
Pristine original version for use with original "AT-bus" machines of the past 1990's.
And make up your own mind about it.
William & Lynne's Excellent Operating System - 386BSD
http://www.jolix.com

  
 386BSD Release
It explains how you can get the source or binaries of Berkeley UNIX for the 80386.
* * People who want a copy of the 386BSD system should bring either: * (A) for 3-1/4 1.44 Meg disks bring * Source = 8 Disks * Binaries = 6 Disks + 1 Boot disk = 7 Disks total * For everything = 7 + 8 = 15 Disks Total !!!!
If you want to be SURE to get a copy, bring a machine capable * of doing a DOS copy to your high density disks.
http://www.dnull.com/~sokol/unix/start.html

  
 386BSD
archives, solves many of the problems associated with 386BSD
In addition, many common Unix packages have been
386BSD has been superseded by FreeBSD and NetBSD.
http://dictionary-x.com/386BSD.html

  
 SliceTest/EmuDAQCrateController/D360/gnu/uclinuxgcc-kit-160899/gcc-2.7.2.3.user/config/i386/386bsd.h
Visit the LXR main site for more information.
*/ 15 #define LIB_SPEC "%{!p:%{!pg:-lc}}%{p:-lc_p}%{pg:-lc_p}" 16 17 #undef SIZE_TYPE 18 #define SIZE_TYPE "unsigned int" 19 20 #undef PTRDIFF_TYPE 21 #define PTRDIFF_TYPE "int" 22 23 #undef WCHAR_TYPE 24 #define WCHAR_TYPE "short unsigned int" 25 26 #define WCHAR_UNSIGNED 1 27 28 #undef WCHAR_TYPE_SIZE 29 #define WCHAR_TYPE_SIZE 16 30 31 /* 386BSD does have atexit.
1 /* Configuration for an i386 running 386BSD as the target machine.
http://www.phys.ufl.edu/cms/tfcvs/cgi-bin/lxr/source/EmuDAQCrateController/D360/gnu/uclinuxgcc-kit-160899/gcc-2.7.2.3.user/config/i386/386bsd.h

  
 386BSD R1.0 Reference CD-ROM: Modular Kernel Design
Utilizing the lessons learned in modular design, the kernel is transformed into independent modules that may be included into the kernel program simply by adding a line into a parameterized makefile describing a system (ex: odysseus.mk).
This is novel work done for 386BSD Release 1.0.
Starting with Release 1.0, the 386BSD kernel was radically changed.
http://jolitz.telemuse.net/pubs/e1994_11a/item

  
 386BSD - OneLook Dictionary Search
386BSD : Free On-line Dictionary of Computing [home, info]
We found one dictionary with English definitions that includes the word 386BSD:
Tip: Click on the first link on a line below to go directly to a page where "386BSD" is defined.
http://www.onelook.com/cgi-bin/cgiwrap/bware/dofind.cgi?word=386BSD

  
 Operating System Source Code Secrets Volume 1: The Basic Kernel
Here is a list of errata in the published version.
Personal perspective on the history is discussed on this website under ``William & Lynne's Excellent Operating System - 386BSD'', a pun on a humorous movie title around the time, which was the authors pet name for the project.
The book has been translated into other languages, including:
http://jolitz.telemuse.net/content/books/scs_vol1/item

  
 386BSD - Pilgerer
Es hatte einige Erweiterungen, die es ermöglichten, es ohne ATandT UNIX Source Lizenz zu verwenden.
Die erste Version wurde 1992 von William Jolitz veröffentlicht.
386BSD war eine Portierung der 4.3BSD NET/2 tapes auf den Intel 386er.
http://www.pilgerer.org/pw/386BSD

  
 Interview: Jordan Hubbard
With just a high school education, Jordan has offered some impressive contributions to the world of computing.
Naturally, now that we COULD collaborate, a number of us started doing so and we immediately began addressing all the problems we found, an effort which led to the 386BSD patchkit and the rest is basically history.
In this interview, Jordan talks about his current involvement with Darwin, as well as his past efforts with FreeBSD and 386BSD.
http://kerneltrap.org/node.php?id=278

  
 History and Introduction to the project
This 4.3BSD code can be traced back to the 1970's, meaning easily more than a decade of development beforehand.
FreeBSD 1.0, released late 1993, was based on the 4.3BSD Net/2 tape, components from 386BSD
FreeBSD as a project began in early 1993, after the "unofficial 386BSD patchkit" lost Bill Jolitz's sanction to continue providing an interim cleanup snapshot for 386BSD, which was progressing slowly for the previous year.
http://people.freebsd.org/~nbm/clug/history.html

  
 [No title]
FullIndex 96 930402 FullIndexIn 19 930402 msdos/4dos: 4dos401d.zip 252 921110 4DOS401B COMMAND.COM replacement, manual, 1/2 4dos401p.zip 283 930121 4DOS401B COMMAND.COM replacement, exe/pgms,2/2 4dos401u.zip 242 921118 4DOS401B update for registered 4DOS 4.0 users 4laser.zoo 5 930119 4DOS HP-LJII configuration program 4utils72.zip 96 930129 4DOS Description editor & file finder (free) msdos/UNSORTED: fromnews
X Window System related stuff FullIndex.zip 99 930402 Full list of files (with comments) at the Kiarchive ls-lR.Z 295 930403 Full (uncommented) pathname list of the Kiarchive 386bsd: 386bsd-0.1
README 3 930211 console-fixes.patch 3 930224 kernmake-dbsym.patch 1 930224 patch00077.tar.Z 2 930211 patch00078.tar.Z 2 930211 patch00079.tar.Z 2 930211 patch00080.tar.Z 2 930211 patch00081.tar.Z 20 930211 patch00082.tar.Z 3 930211 sort-T.patch 1 930224 386bsd/misc/pcfs: part1 38 921125 part2 44 921125 part3 44 921125 part4 44 921125 patch1 9 921125 386bsd/patch: bin
http://www.ibiblio.org/pub/academic/russian-studies/Networks/MailServers/kiae.su/full_index.koi8

  
 386BSD - Wikipedia
Anmerkungen zur Geschichte von 386BSD von Lynne Jolitz
Dieses hat aber mit 386BSD nur wenig Gemeinsamkeiten, da Jolitz seine Arbeit für BSDI vernichtete, bevor er BSDI verließ.
Jolitz, William F. und Jolitz, Lynne Greer: Porting UNIX to the 386: A Practical Approach, 18-teilige Serie in Dr. Dobbs Journal, Januar 1991 - Juli 1992.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/386BSD

  
 The UNIX Forums - 386BSD - Where can I find it
I know it's a free operating system, but the homepage is nonexistent, and I can't find it anywhere.
The UNIX Forums - 386BSD - Where can I find it
04-15-2001 12:49 PM I'm looking for a copy of 386BSD Unix...
http://www.unix.com/printthread.php?t=640

  
 bugs-386bsd
Requirements to join: interest in actively working on 386bsd to improve the operating system for use by yourself and others.
This mailing list is listed in the list of Publicly Accessible Mailing Lists - maintained by Stephanie da Silva.
http://www.ii.uib.no/~magnus/lists/bugs-386bsd.html

  
 [TUHS] Just a bit of (Intel BSD) history
(I've also got the 386BSD 0.0 source files on my machine - about a decade after I almost got them downloaded but decided not to because Linux was marginally cheaper in terms of disk numbers.
If you'll go to http://masalai.free.fr/386BSD.tar.gz, you'll find Bill Jolitz's 386BSD 1.0 - mostly the source code.
I'll have to mount them loopback and copy the files off them.) And perhaps it can be placed with the other 4.3BSD family members in the appropriate minnie.tuhs directory, Warren?
http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/2004-March/000911.html

  
 Compiling on FREE/386bsd
If anyone has zmailer working on 386bsd I'd be interested in a copy of the Config used, specifically, any COPTS and DEFS used and any other information to make a clean compile.
Failing that, I'd settle for some suggestions, hints, observations -- whatever it takes :) (By the way, do I have the latest version?
http://www.zmailer.org/mhalist/1993/msg00161.html

  
 386 BSD - Waikato Linux Users Group
Due to the BSD licence problems in early 90s' development halted quite quick after it's initial release July 14 1992.
386BSD resulted into (directly or indirectly) BSD/386, NetBSD, FreeBSD, BSD/OS, Darwin, OpenBSD and more.
Unless otherwise noted, all pages on this site are licensed under the WlugWikiLicense.
http://www.wlug.org.nz/386BSD

  
 Significant changes from 386bsd 0.1 + patchkit 0.2.2 to 0.8
This was generated from the src/doc/CHANGES.prev log, and lists both by date, and by area or port affected.
Significant changes from 386bsd 0.1 + patchkit 0.2.2 to 0.8
http://www.netbsd.org/Changes/changes-0.8.html

  
 Trouble with Scheme-7.2 on 386BSD 0.1
I did the 386BSD port in 386bsd.tar.z, and I run it with no such problems.
Previous message: Trouble with Scheme-7.2 on 386BSD 0.1
http://martigny.ai.mit.edu/pipermail/info-cscheme/1993-April/000110.html

  
 [No title]
News) Organization: ACAL, EECS, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor Lines: 8 Xref: pitt.edu comp.lsi.cad:1011 comp.unix.bsd:9677 comp.os.linux:18726 X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7] I'm looking for 386bsd or Linux ports of CAD packages such as those mentioned in the FAQ.
If you've successfully ported one to 386bsd or Linux, please let me know.
http://jamaica.ee.pitt.edu/Archives/NewsGroupArchives/comp.lsi.cad/1992/Dec/comp.lsi.cad.0243.txt

  
 [GEOL1: 386bsd]
If so, could you help us > get the X11 running with a video card that uses the S3 chipset?
Jim Hinthorne writes: > Is anyone using 386bsd?
http://grass.itc.it/pipermail/grassuser/1993-May/016661.html

  
 [No title]
defined(__osf__) /* * on 386/BSD, the block size is in f_fsize * and f_bsize is the optimum transfer size *************** *** 2687,2693 **** struct dqblk *dq; { int fd, res; !
defined(__osf__) /* * on 386/BSD, the block size is in f_fsize * and f_bsize is the optimum transfer size --- 2546,2552 ---- } # else /* sgi
# "386bsd" - 386/BSD, FreeBSD and derivatives # "domainosbsd" - HP/Apollo Domain BSD 4.3 # Warning: hpux, pyr are hardcoded in some of the makefiles (sorry) # MAJOR CONFIGURATION # set to one of the above (or configure your own below) EOT !
http://fy.chalmers.se/~appro/SITE/CAP60.pl195.patch

  
 386BSD Newsgroups: comp.unix.bsd
386BSD - Frequently Asked Questions (last updated 25-Apr-92)
SVNet Meeting: May 13, 1992: 386BSD, a guided tour by Bill Jolitz
http://www.dnull.com/bsd/others

  
 FAQ: comp.lang.tcl Frequently Asked Questions (2/5) - -Q8K- What does it take to get Tcl/Tk to compile on 386bsd/Linux ...
Patches for 386BSD were posted to comp.lang.tcl back in Nov. 1992 to alt.sources.
See one of the ftp archive sites for this group for them.
http://www.stsci.edu/apsb/doc/tcl/tclFAQ/part2/faq-doc-11.html

  
 386BSD - Wikipédia
386BSD est un système d'exploitation de type BSD, dérivé de 4.3BSD NET/2 sur les architectures i386.
386BSD a été principalement écrit par Lynne et William Jolitz.
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/386BSD

  
 386BSD Patch kit patch contributors
FreeBSD Handbook : FreeBSD contributor list : 386BSD Patch kit patch contributors
http://wymple.gs.net/freebsd/handbook/handbook275.html

  
 386BSD
Article Publication TimeStamp: 10/12/1999 02:00 AM 386BSD articles at ArticlesGalore.com ©
http://www.articlesgalore.com/documents/386BSD

  
 1996 BSD Usenet Announcements
13 Mar 1996 - [comp.unix.bsd] NetBSD, FreeBSD, and 386BSD (0.1) FAQ (Part 2 of 10)
13 Mar 1996 - [comp.unix.bsd] NetBSD, FreeBSD, and 386BSD (0.1) FAQ (Part 1 of 10)
13 Oct 1996 - [comp.unix.bsd] NetBSD, FreeBSD, and 386BSD (0.1) FAQ (Part 8 of 10)
http://minnie.tuhs.org/BSD-info/1996-announce.html

  
 Exploit world -- FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, 386BSD, BSDI section
Exploit world -- FreeBSD, OpenBSD, NetBSD, 386BSD, BSDI section
http://www.insecure.org/sploits_bsd.html

  
 [JargonF - dictionnaire informatique] Définition de 386BSD
Articles voisins : 2.5G < 2K < 2U < 3* < 3615 < 386BSD > 3COM > 3D > 3D-DDI > 3DES > 3Dfx.
Vous êtes ici : linux-france.org > projets > jargonf > DIV > 386BSD :
http://www.linux-france.org/prj/jargonf/DIV/386BSD.html

Compwisdom
 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 CompWisdom.com Usage implies agreement with terms.