|
| |
| | DotGNU - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
 | | Currently, the main DotGNU software release is Portable.NET, an implementation of the Common Language Infrastructure that is able to compile and run.NET-compilable languages such as C# and VB.NET, among others, on numerous computing platforms. | | | DotGNU aims to be for webservices and for C# programs what GNU/Linux is rapidly becoming for desktop and server applications: the industry leader and provider of Free Software solutions. | | | The irc channel #dotgnu on irc.freenode.net is one of the main communication tools of the DotGNU project. |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/?title=DotGNU
(420 words)
|
|
| |
| | Articles |
| | DotGNU, a Free Software Web services project that's a response to Microsoft's.NET, is hosting a 36-hour marathon IRC meet-a-thon this weekend aimed at interested developers and experienced contributors to hash over some issues. | | | DotGNU could be known as the Free Software.NET-like Project That Isn't Mono, but developers there say the less publicized project is making good progress, with a heavy-traffic email list as part of the evidence. | | | Gopal.V says the project has 20 to 30 core developers who are working on a variety of proposed Web services projects. |
|
http://software.newsforge.com/print.pl?sid=02/03/15/0018214
(433 words)
|
|
| |
| | [PRC] GNU's answer to dot net - http://www.dotgnu.org |
| | DotGNU, a project of GNU, is really a meta-project that will consist of a good number of such [30]software development projects. | | | This is an event to take stock of the last quarter for the DotGNU developers, and an excellent oppurtunity for newcomers to familiarize themselves with the project. | | | We're building something that could be called an "operating system for the internet" - a collection of tools that allow software components to interact with each other over the internet. |
|
http://mail.sarai.net/pipermail/prc/2002-December/001966.html
(986 words)
|
|
| |
| | Development Tools |
| | DotGNU is the Free Software Foundation umbrella project for the.Net Framework. | | | As with DotGNU, although most of the current development in Mono seems to be tightly aligned with Microsoft's.Net for Windows, it has also branched development sub-projects like Gtk#, which is obviously heavily influenced by its ties with GNOME. | | | If you are a GNU purist you will surely be more interested in the DotGNU implementation, as it builds on other GNU projects. |
|
http://tools.devchannel.org/print.pl?sid=04/04/16/1755236
(634 words)
|
|
| |
| | LWN: DotGNU Coding Competition |
| | The DotGNU Project, which is part of the GNU project of the Free Software Foundation, is pleased to announce its first international Collaborative Coding Competition. | | | Furthermore, excluded from participation is everyone who has had access to proprietary source code of the Microsoft Windows system, or to source code for any proprietary implementation of System.Windows.Forms. | | | The participants in this competition will collaboratively complete the implementation of the System.Windows.Forms part of the C# class libraries for DotGNU Portable.NET, with the goal of duplicating the functionality of the proprietary library so that programs written against it can be run on Free Software. |
|
http://lwn.net/Articles/46720
(681 words)
|
|
| |
| | DotGNU Portable.NET FAQ |
| | DotGNU Portable.NET is built in accordance with the requirements of the GNU Project. | | | DotGNU Portable.NET is focused on compatibility with the ECMA specifications for CLI and extensions as defined by the.NET Framework SDK. | | | Reuse is the stated reason for why the Mono project is writing all of their tools in C#. |
|
http://www.southern-storm.com.au/pnet_faq.html
(6460 words)
|
|
| |
| | Mono and dotGNU: what's the point? The Register |
| | Mono and dotGNU are interesting projects for people who are interested in computer languages, compiler construction and other fairly esoteric, hard-core areas of software engineering. | | | Microsoft is working on adding edit-and-continue to VB.NET, generics to C#, embedding the CLR into the next version of SQL Server, and making a stack of improvements to managed C++. | | | Opinion Two open-source projects, Mono and dotGNU, are aimed at providing alternatives to Microsoft’s.NET framework and developer tools. |
|
http://www.theregister.com/2004/02/11/mono_and_dotgnu_whats
(758 words)
|
|
| |
| | HOT TOPIC: Mono and DotGNU |
| | DotGNU -- an open source webservices meta-project -- "We're building something that could be called an 'operating system for the internet' -- a collection of tools that allow software components to interact with each other over the internet. | | | The Mono and DotGNU projects are Open Source projects that, after several years of development, are beginning to bear fruit. | | | The DotGNU and Mono projects will cooperate to build a full Free Software solution. |
|
http://linuxdevices.com/articles/AT4179133067.html
(1801 words)
|
|
| |
| | DotGNU achieves CD release |
| | DotGNU, the GNU Project's Free Software alternative to Microsoft's.NET initiative, has made a CD release for version 0.1. | | | DotGNU programs can also be integrated with phpGroupWare. | | | Further information about the DotGNU project including how to participate is available from the DotGNU Website, or via the project's Freenode IRC channel, #dotgnu. |
|
http://www.linuxdevices.com/news/NS6410224589.html
(451 words)
|
|
| |
| | Free Software Group Not Well With Mono |
| | On the other side is the DotGNU project, which is part of the GNU project, whose principal organizational sponsor is the Free Software Foundation (FSF). | | | Bollow said he doesn't consider DotGNU to be a free implementation of the.NET development framework (as Mono sees itself). | | | The FSF is perhaps best known for its creation of the Free Software movement itself and the GNU GPL. |
|
http://www.internetnews.com/dev-news/article.php/3361991
(1094 words)
|
|
| |
| | PatentFUD - DotGNU Wiki |
| | The concern that Microsoft might possibly be interested in enforcing patents against Free Software projects such as DotGNU or Mono is confirmed by statements which Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer made in March 2003 at CeBit, Germany's main IT exhibition. | | | This means that the worst that can happen to a developer working on these aspects of the DotGNU project is that the developer might be forced to accept a royalty-free patent license from Microsoft which prevents the developer from suing Microsoft for patent infringement. | | | The patent is relevant to the parts of.NET to which the DotGNU project is creating an alternative, Free Software implementation. |
|
http://wiki2.dotgnu.info/PatentFUD
(3727 words)
|
|
| |
| | Synopsis on what DotGNU Is - OSNews.com |
| | DotGNU is an offical GNU project; it is an attempt at providing a viable alternative to Microsoft's.NET and Hailstorm business strategies. | | | DotGNU is a "meta project" composed of many different services; the main goal, as taken from the DotGNU FAQ, is "... | | | Remember: Unlike Mono, the Portable.NET project seeks to create an alternative but compatiable technology, much like the WINE project. |
|
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=7220
(952 words)
|
|
| |
| | Open source steps in to duplicate .Net CNET News.com |
| | The Mono software project, hosted by Ximian, is designed to reproduce on Linux the ability to execute programs written in the C# language invented by Microsoft and used in.Net. | | | David Sugar, author of an open-source telephony server software project called Bayonne, will lead the DotGNU effort, which will be hosted at the Savannah Web site. | | | Miguel de Icaza, Mono founder and Ximian chief technology officer, said in an interview that he believes Microsoft's technology is worth emulating. |
|
http://news.com.com/2100-1001-269665.html?legacy=cnet
(1411 words)
|
|
| |
| | Linux Today - LinuxProgramming: This week in DotGNU Issue 1 |
| | DotGNU is a replacement for Mono, allowing the GNOME desktop to remain 100% GNU (GNU Object Model Environment). | | | Perhaps this "slowdown" should be less "temporary" and GNU should accept that Free Software is all about cooperation, not monopoly. | | | Get the facts you need to make the choice between Windows and Linux. |
|
http://www.linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2001-10-20-004-20-NW-SW&reply=007
(462 words)
|
|
| |
| | Group offers free alternatives to Microsoft's .Net |
| | As for DotGNU, the project will be led by David Sugar, the CTO of FreeDevelopers.net, and it will seek to develop free software for enabling decentralized services and authentication, the Free Software Foundation said. | | | While Mono and DotGNU will offer different components to.Net, they will be complementary, the Free Software Foundation said in a statement. | | | Open source software maker Ximian is heading up the development of the Mono project, which is aimed to be a GNU/Linux-based version of the Microsoft.Net development platform. |
|
http://www.networkworld.com/news/2001/0709msnet.html
(570 words)
|
|
| |
| | LessUrgentThingsToDo - DotGNU Wiki |
| | DotGNU does not want to merely duplicate technology that is already available in proprietary software; rather DotGNU wants to be at the forefront of technological evolution. | | | In the long run, we really want to have an IDE (Integrated Development Environment) with integrated gui designers, and debugging tools for RAD (rapid application development) programming. | | | For this we reason we should work together with innovative and experimental Free Software projects like lainOS. |
|
http://wiki.dotgnu.info/LessUrgentThingsToDo
(419 words)
|
|
| |
| | Running .NET on Linux with DotGNU: Builder AU: Program |
| | To start, you will need to download either the DotGNU source code or binaries for your particular operating system. | | | We looked at one of these projects earlier, with our tutorial on "Using Mono for.NET Linux Development" and in this article, we are going to be looking DotGNU, the other major project designed to bring.NET to other platforms. | | | One of the disadvantages of using Visual Studio.NET and the.NET framework to develop applications has been the lack of cross-platform support. |
|
http://www.builderau.com.au/program/0,39024614,39130565,00.htm
(731 words)
|
|
| |
| | SummerOfCode2005 - Handhelds.org MoinMoin Wiki |
| | This is nice because an alternative solution would be to use the FPA coproccessor, which is used on ARMv4l processors in a very buggy software emulation mode using exceptions that are send by the ARM CPU to the kernel. | | | But most are not, pending review by the OE developers and my mentor. | | | However, I wanted to implement a support for a coproccessor for the CPU's that have a hardware implementation of it. |
|
http://www.handhelds.org/moin/moin.cgi/SummerOfCode2005
(1645 words)
|
|
| |
| | SourceForge.net: macs-dotgnu |
| | Dear Hackers, this is a FYI that i have added a MACS node on the DotGNu wiki please review : http://wiki.dotgnu.org/MACS_40Freport http://wiki.dotgnu.org/DotGNUAuthentication?action=highlightandvalue=macs I would like to also ask about the status and plans for this. |
|
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_id=1783414&forum_id=31120
(82 words)
|
|
| |
| | Mono Community - Mono vs DotGNU's Portable.Net? |
| | Has anyone used the Mono runtime with the dotGNU WinForms library (that appears to be working and directly to X11)? | | | So, since Mono seems to be reluctant in implementing the WinForms library, yet has a faster JIT, my question is this: |
|
http://www.gotmono.com/cgi-bin/yabb/YaBB.pl?board=PROJECT;action=display;num=1057645842
(911 words)
|
|
| |
| | [No title] |
| | I'm irritated at the crappy software that my university bought to managed its enrollment. | | | byte[1][] is though :p [06:14] MikeW (Mike@159-134-233-160.as1.cbr.castlebar.eircom.net) joined #dotgnu. | | | lol HanClinto, that project add file issue, is just not handling a click event i think [06:31] LXS (~lxs@84.119.103.111) joined #dotgnu. |
|
http://ajmitch.linuxworks.co.nz/dotgnu.log.18Feb2005
(1809 words)
|
|
| |
| | [No title] |
| | i was stripping the dotgnu binaries i musta somehow on accident stripped part of binutils [11:25] | | | [02:56] Action: nb checks on this [02:57] mensan (user@ipd41.220.tellas.gr) left irc: Read error: 60 (Operation timed out) [03:15] mensan (user@dyn132.xalk1.nas.panafonet.gr) joined #dotgnu. | | | [09:34] gadek (~gadek@56.25.internet.uqam.ca) left irc: Read error: 60 (Operation timed out) [09:41] BiiruXP (quake@vetmanage.com) joined #dotgnu. |
|
http://ajmitch.linuxworks.co.nz/dotgnu.log.05Jan2005
(2375 words)
|
|
| |
| | GNUe Traffic #5 For 1 Dec 2001 |
| | He asked for a quick overview of the dotGNU vision. | | | Bradley said the important thing was sharing protocols, not necessarily code. | | | Norbert Bollow (nb) said Microsoft.NET was trying to lock people in. |
|
http://www.kerneltraffic.org/GNUe/gnue20011201_5.html
(3674 words)
|
|
| |
| | The folks behind the DotGNU (kottke.org) |
| | The folks behind the DotGNU Project are attempting to build a free software version of Microsoft's.NET (not an implementation of.NET, but rather a replacement). | | | If a system of this kind can be decentralized and secure, why not make it that way? | | | Secondly DotGNU will emphasize security, it will use encryption wherever possible to keep user data secure and hidden." It would be nice if something like this took off; I'm a little wary of Microsoft's motives concerning the storage and access of my personal data. |
|
http://www.kottke.org/01/10/the-folks-behind-the-dotgnu
(179 words)
|
|
| |
| | [openstandaarden] [DotGNU Announcement]The DotGNU Project officially endorses the use of the Jabber Protocols |
| | This endorsement means that we, the DotGNU Steering Committee, encourage all DotGNU development projects to implement support for Jabber protocols to the extent that it makes sense to do so; this is not meant to discourage the additional implementation of other protocols. | | | The DotGNU Project hereby officially endorses the Jabber protocols (as described in the Internet Draft draft-miller-jabber-00.txt) as a mechanism for routing information via DotGNU webservice technologies. | | | All existing Jabber technology which is Free Software with licensing that is compatible with the GNU General Public License is acceptable for use in DotGNU. |
|
http://www.openstandaarden.be/pipermail/openstandaarden/2002-May/000639.html
(223 words)
|
|
| |
| | Re: Inline::SWIG (+ DOTGNU + introspector = rosetta stone) |
| | I proposed a working group (subcommittee) in the dotgnu project today to compile such a document. | | | I call for at least on of each of you from the inline and swig project to help create this rosetta stone, this tranlation table. | | | Re: [Swig] Re: Inline::SWIG (+ DOTGNU + introspector = rosetta stone) David Beazley |
|
http://www.mail-archive.com/inline@perl.org/msg01563.html
(473 words)
|
|
| |
| | FrontPage - DotGNU Wiki |
| | Further DotGNU discussions happen on the DotGNU developers mailing list (http://dotgnu.org/mailman/listinfo/developers), the | | | DotGnuVsMicrosoft - How the DotGNU project sees Microsoft Corporation | | | DotGnuVsMono - Which of these projects should I contribute to? |
|
http://wiki2.dotgnu.info/FrontPage
(468 words)
|
|
| |
| | Introspector Project refocused on DotGNU(.NET) and RDF(Semantic Web) |
| | The Introspector project has after having an seemily endless set of goals as realigned/refocused itself with a new set of goals that are achievable. | | | They do not me to post bug reports about problems that any user might have, I think this is very strange and unfair to the other users of DotGNU(tm). | | | After more than a year of research into the semantic web and the dotgnu system, I have concluded that the main goals of the introspector can be reached much more quickly with much easier goals. |
|
http://www.advogato.org/article/696.html
(1546 words)
|
|
| |
| | .::t3rmin4t0r::. : dotgnu/dotgnu-2002-mails-2005-12-07-16-41.html |
| | This might be bad, as we might decide to remove to changes in the code at a later date. | | | The coding standards of pnetlib has made us straggle in comparison to mono or ocl.... | | | DotGNU Pnet should be a community and the current state of pnetlib has been unsatisfactory for me.. |
|
http://t3.dotgnu.info/blog/dotgnu/dotgnu-2002-mails-2005-12-07-16-41.html
(1031 words)
|
|
| |
| | DotGNU Portable.NET v0.6.10 released |
| | Posted by: Maciek Plewa on November 10, 2004 @ 03:33 AM The DotGNU project is proud to announce the immediate availability of the latest release of Portable.NET 0.6.10 for Windows, MacOS X, Linux and BeOS systems. | | | DotGNU Portable.NET is available under the GPL/LGPL license allowing you to use it in commercial products. | | | To read more or download the source code here. |
|
http://www.theserverside.net/common/printthread.tss?thread_id=29895
(126 words)
|
|
| |
| | LtU Classic Archives |
| | A useful overview of DotGNU and.Net in general. | | | Posted to general by Ehud Lamm on 1/7/02; 6:05:48 AM | | | Of special interest is the dicussion of the Portable.Net project building a runtime engine, a C# compiler, and the C# system library. |
|
http://lambda-the-ultimate.org/classic/message2422.html
(109 words)
|
|
| |
| | license-discuss@opensource.org: 7937: RE: [DotGNU]proposal: DotGNU Trademark License |
| | > > > > > > > > "GNU" is a registered trademark of the Free Software > Foundation, Inc. > > "DotGNU Webservice" is a servicemark of the Free Software > Foundation, > > Inc. > > > > TERMS AND CONDITIONS FOR USING THE "DotGNU Webservice" SERVICEMARK. | | | Therefore, by using the "DotGNU Webservice" > > servicemark in such a commercial context, you indicate your > > acceptance of this License to do so, and all its terms and > > conditions. | | | However, nothing else grants you permission to use the > > "DotGNU Webservice" servicemark in the context of making > commercial > > service offerings; that is prohibited by law if you do not accept > > this License. |
|
http://www.crynwr.com/cgi-bin/ezmlm-cgi/3/7937
(432 words)
|
|
| |
| | SourceForge.net: introspector-developers |
| | I dont know if we can include w3c licensed code as part of the dotgnu project. | | | But the n3 parser for example, that would be good as part of the dotgnu.rdf native implementation. | | | Can you give me permission to dual license it? |
|
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=3765031
(316 words)
|
|
| |
| | Forum |
| | C#, any language that can work with IL (the executable format of DotGNU) code | | | Licensed under The GNU General Public License, Version 2 or later. | | | The copyright licensing notice below applies to this text. |
|
http://directory.fsf.org/Forum.html
(354 words)
|
|
| |
| | [No title] |
| | this will give you everything you ever wanted from dotGNU project | | | This information about the cvs servers isn't up on dotgnu.info, it should be pretty soon because they're going through elections as of 10/19/02... | | | The goal is to get dotGNU's portable.net up, compiled, and running. |
|
http://www.devhood.com/tutorials/tutorial_details.aspx?tutorial_id=557
(477 words)
|
|
| |
| | Op-ed piece asks, "Mono and dotGNU, what's the point?" |
| | Posted by: Ted Neward on February 12, 2004 @ 01:03 PM In an opinion piece on The Register, an author questions the point of open-source.NET implementations like Mono and dotGNU: "While providing freedom of choice might be reason enough to justify a project, practical programmers could be asking: What's the point?" | | | Op-ed piece asks, andquot;Mono and dotGNU, what's the point?andquot; | | | NOISY: Op-ed piece asks, "Mono and dotGNU, what's the point?" |
|
http://www.theserverside.net/tss?service=direct/0/NewsThread/threadViewer.bookmark.link&sp=l23926
(1673 words)
|
|
| |
| | DOTGNU |
| | But that's why it so important that we at least react and DOTGNU is | | | DotGNU, and the work being done for a next generation Savannah. | | | This includes the phpGroupWare project, which is now part of |
|
http://zgp.org/linux-elitists/3C1DB9AC.9070205@dewinter.com.html
(8166 words)
|
|
| |
| | Debian -- pnet |
| | The goal of this DotGNU project is to build a suite of free software tools to build and execute.NET applications, including a C# compiler, assembler, disassembler, and runtime engine. |
|
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/pnet
(92 words)
|
|
| |
| | gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer |
| | The first C# programs runs with the brand-new DotGNU Just-In-Time Comp (31 Dec 12:38) | | | Subject: The first C# programs runs with the brand-new DotGNU Just-In-Time Compiler | | | The first C# programs runs with the brand-new DotGNU Just-In-Time Compiler |
|
http://blog.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.dotgnu.developer
(971 words)
|
|
| |
| | [JDEV] DotGNU using Jabber |
| | one of the 'leaders' of the DotGNU has published his ideas on how he thinks DotGNU should do adressing, at http://www.dotgnu.org/spec/rls.htm. |
|
http://mailman.jabber.org/pipermail/jdev/2001-July/007913.html
(144 words)
|
|
| |
| | www-rdf-interest@w3.org from February 2003: by date |
| | Call for Papers HICSS - THE SEMANTIC WEB: STRUCTURE and CRITICAL INFORMATION ISSUES MINITRACK Thomas E. Potok | | | Re: [DotGNU]Reminder - Weekly DotGNU Meeting James Michael DuPont | | | Clarifications needed for the Collection construct (with CR) Karsten Tolle |
|
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2003Feb
(1013 words)
|
|
| |
| | Debian -- pnetc |
| | These are required for running C programs compiled for DotGNU. | | | A set of C class libraries built to support the DotGNU Portable.NET interpreter. |
|
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/devel/pnetc.html
(78 words)
|
|
| |
| | Mono and dotGNU |
| | If he had actually downloaded and use Mono, or read the latest release notes, he would have found that remoting exists, its nearly feature complete and works extremely well when used between Mono on Linux and the Microsoft CLR on Windows. | | | Mono and dotGNU possibly offer an interesting perspective for companies who don't want to run Windows server yet, but do run Windows clients, and do want to use.NET for applications. | | | Rich WinForm clients can be developed for.NET and run on the Microsoft.NET CLR, with the business logic written in.NET and run on Linux/Solaris server with Mono. |
|
http://weblogs.asp.net/mdavey/archive/2004/02/25/79691.aspx
(199 words)
|
|
| |
| | #phpgroupware log |
| | You can access the #phpgroupware IRC channel on the irc.openprojects.net IRC server on port 6667. | | | just been busy dotgnu is important yeah, I know... | | | phpgw is the Webservices part in addition to stuff like jabber-rpc (which is in the process of adoption) --> irzyxel (irz@213.70.43.252) has joined #phpgroupware i see oh really t3rmin4t0r: so is there someone on the dotgnu team who thoroughly understands phpgw's engineering? |
|
http://www.gnuenterprise.org/~psu/phpgw25Apr2002.html
(1492 words)
|
|
| |
| | DotGNU PNET |
| | The goal of this project is to build a suite of free software tools to build and execute.NET applications, including a C# compiler, assembler, disassembler, and runtime engine. | | | This page is a temporary spot for any of my DotGNU Portable.NET-related activities. |
|
http://www.thisiscool.com/dotgnu_pnet.htm
(238 words)
|
|
| |
| | freshmeat.net: Project details for DotGNU Portable.NET |
| | DotGNU Portable.Net is a portable suite of tools (including a C# compiler, assembler, and runtime engine) for non-Microsoft platforms such as GNU/Linux. | | | It is a part of the DotGNU meta-project. |
|
http://freshmeat.net/releases/83933
(359 words)
|
|
| |
| | MyXAML Ported on DotGNU - OSNews.com |
| | Here is a screenshot of the default WinForms powered MyXAML calculator demonstration, and here is the same demonstration running under DotGNU's work-in-progress Qt-powered WinForms backend. |
|
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=6895
(118 words)
|
|
|
