Exec-shield - CompWisdom
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: Exec-shield


Related Topics



  
 Exec Shield - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Exec Shield attempts to flag data memory as non-executable and program memory as non-writeable.
The patch additionally increases the difficulty of inserting and executing "shell code" rendering most exploits useless.
Implementation of PT_GNU_STACK and PT_GNU_HEAP binary markings and the deprecation of PT_GNU_HEAP are not yet covered here, nor is information on Exec Shield's minimal ASLR.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exec_Shield   (340 words)

  
 NX bit: Information From Answers.com
Exec Shield allows these controls to be set for both binary executables and for libraries; if an executable loads a library requiring a given restriction relaxed, the executable will inherit that marking and have that restriction relaxed.
Exec Shield only checks for two ELF header markings, which dictate whether the stack or heap needs to be executable.
SEGMEXEC does not rely on such volatile systems as that used in Exec Shield, and thus does not encounter conditions in which finegrained NX bit emulation cannot be enforced; it does, however, have the halving of virtual address space mentioned above.
http://www.answers.com/topic/nx-bit   (2953 words)

  
 EXEC 8 definition of EXEC 8 in computing dictionary - by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
EXEC 8 - Unisys's operating system from about 1980 to 2000, by which time it was a dying breed with Unisys moving to Windows NT and Unix.
EXEC 8 definition of EXEC 8 in computing dictionary - by the Free Online Dictionary, Thesaurus and Encyclopedia.
This information should not be considered complete, up to date, and is not intended to be used in place of a visit, consultation, or advice of a legal, medical, or any other professional.
http://computing-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/EXEC+8   (97 words)

  
 Securing Slackware with exec shield
[Announcement] “Exec Shield”, new Linux security feature [On-line].
http://www.userlocal.com/articles/securingslackware.php   (3031 words)

  
 LWN: "Exec Shield" for Linux
Lets take the big sendmail hole as an example, in which case a carefully constructed email header overflows a string buffer and a jump address located after the buffer.
So by overflowing the return address (or a function pointer, or anything else) with an _ASCII_ email header you simply cannot generate the proper return address that jumps on the system() function, because the address of the system() function contains the \0 [zero] byte.
With the exec shield activated, as you can see in the original article, the system() function (part of libc) is placed into the "ASCII armor" area.
http://lwn.net/Articles/31033   (1314 words)

  
 Linux: Exec Shield Overflow Protection
In the first case, that would be bad for any binary with a
Comment "How posts should be done" by somercet
This is followed with a longer section devoted to describing how the solution has been implemented, followed by an examination of its limitations.
http://kerneltrap.org/node.php?id=644   (2575 words)

  
 PaX (http://pageexec.virtualave.net)
nExec Shield cannot even guarantee that when a task is fully loaded in memory, that there do not exist memory regions that are both writable and executable, even if an application did not request such mappings.
nFor the most part, Exec Shield and W^X are similar (in that they both provide a subset of the features of PaX), so I will not give a point-by-point analysis.
nExec Shield recently discovered a bug (an off-by-one page), due to someone running paxtest on an Exec Shield machine, that resulted in a page of memory being writable and executable that was assumed otherwise.
http://www.grsecurity.net/PaX-presentation_files/slide0033.htm   (154 words)

  
 Cedega issues - Ubuntu Forums
Someone already mentioned this but by adding exec to your fstab you will fix the error=21 problem, this includes fat32 partitions.
As a side note, you should be able to play them off your windows drive, but I think you need the 'exec' option in your /etc/fstab entry for that partition/drive.
Anyway, I DO have the exec in every partition that could possibly matter.
http://www.ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=21970   (1046 words)

  
 Linux-Kernel Archive: Re: [Announcement] "Exec Shield"
Maybe in reply to: Ingo Molnar: "[Announcement] "Exec Shield", new Linux security feature"
Re: [Announcement] "Exec Shield", new Linux security feature
Reply: Ingo Molnar: "Re: [Announcement] "Exec Shield", new Linux security feature"
http://www.uwsg.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0305.0/0577.html   (348 words)

  
 [No title]
load_addr_set) elf_flags = MAP_FIXED; - } else if (elf_ex.e_type == ET_DYN) { - /* Try and get dynamic programs out of the way of the default mmap - base, as well as whatever program they might try to exec.
This - is because the brk will follow the loader, and is not movable.
http://www.hup.hu/old/stuff/kernel/exec-shield/exec-shield-2.6.0-test7   (1132 words)

  
 CedegaWiki - error=21
error=21 can also mean that you require the parameter exec to be added to the partition on reiserFS and possibly other FS'es in kernel 2.6.x
http://terrasque.mine.nu/phpwiki?pagename=error=21   (600 words)

  
 [No title]
However note, only a + * small number exec malloc's are done so the wasted memory + * is not likely to be an issue.
Thus even a small + * allocation will use an entire page.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/xfree/patchsets/4.3.99.901/patch-4.3.99.901-0.1/9961_all_4.3.0-libGL-exec-shield-fixes-v2.patch   (1355 words)

  
 Exec-Shield vs. PaX
Ingo says so because he did not understand how PaX works.
apparently none of you understood what the tests and Exec- Shield did, otherwise you would have known that Exec-Shield cannot possibly pass these tests due to its design (or at least not without going down the OpenBSD road).
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2003/11/msg00206.html   (1281 words)

  
 Wine HQ - WWN Issue #210
What's interesting about this one is it seems to have appeared in dead tree format on newstands.
It relies on changing the memory layout of an executable...
One problem on the radar screen deals with supporting two new Linux-isms: exec shield and prelinking.
http://www.winehq.com/?issue=210   (1647 words)

  
 DVD Talk Forum - "The Shield" Exec Producer signs 2 year deal
Valued at roughly $6 million, Ryan is set to make $200,000 per episode for each of "The Shield's" 26 episodes likely produced over the course of the next two seasons.
In a deal that will likely keep "The Shield" on FX through 2005, 20th Century Fox has signed a seven-figure, two-year development deal with the series' creator and executive producer Shawn Ryan.
While a fourth season (which would begin airing in January 2005) has not been officially picked up, it appears to be a foregone conclusion based on the deal and the show's overall success.
http://www.dvdtalk.com/forum/printthread.php?t=298781   (253 words)

  
 Red Hat Releases New Linux Update
Red Hat Execs Talk on Profiting from 'Free Software'
Red Hat Exec: Linux Desktops Must Stand Out to Thrive
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1643811,00.asp   (984 words)

  
 LinuxQuestions.org - Why doesn't CrossOver Office work on Fedora and RedHat Enterprise Linux 3 - where Linux users come ...
With the Fedora and RHEL 3 releases, RedHat has introduced two new features to their Linux: 'prelink' and 'exec shield'.
This will turn exec shield off at boot time, to turn it off now type the following command as root
On Redhat Enterprise Linux 3 you will need to run the following command in the same terminal you launch OfficeSetup or a Crossover based application.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&forumid=37&threadid=162026   (362 words)

  
 Linux Kernel: [Announcement] "Exec Shield", new Linux security feature
: Davide Libenzi: "Re: [Announcement] "Exec Shield", new Linux security feature"
: linux_at_horizon.com: "Re: [Announcement] "Exec Shield", new Linux security feature"
: Chuck Ebbert: "Re: [Announcement] "Exec Shield", new Linux security feature"
http://seclists.org/lists/linux-kernel/2003/May/0371.html   (1247 words)

  
 [No title]
of your weapons, armour or shield, but any complex enchantment is
exec ("say You should take care worshipping people like that...",self);pause;
Notice: the examination will give you the basic idea of the quality
http://www.valhalla.com/newdoc/fightersguild.html   (2157 words)

  
 nuke.olivier.blogdns.org
I intend to put some tips on qmail, linux, and the e-mail on the internet in general.
Fujitsu execs take pay cut after Tokyo exchange crash
http://nuke.olivier.blogdns.org   (503 words)

  
 Exec Shield Overflow Protection - OSNews.com
He describes the patch, which is against the 2.4.20-rc1 kernel, as, "The exec-shield feature provides protection against stack, buffer or function pointer overflows, and against other types of exploits that rely on overwriting data structures and/or putting code into those structures.
Ingo Molnar has announced a new kernel-based security feature for Linux/x86 called "Exec Shield".
Linked by Eugenia Loli-Queru on 2003-05-03 15:48:30 UTC, submitted by Jeremy Andrews
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=3465   (158 words)

  
 SecurityFocus
You can start reading about Exec Shield at
and you can disable exec shield in /proc/sys/kernel/exec-shield, setting
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/82/380831   (223 words)

Compwisdom
 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 CompWisdom.com Usage implies agreement with terms.