|
| |
| | RFC 959 - File Transfer Protocol. J. Postel, J.K. Reynolds. |
 | | RFC 959 October 1985 File Transfer Protocol When the data reaches the receiving host, it will be transformed in a manner dependent on the logical byte size and the particular host. | | | RFC 959 October 1985 File Transfer Protocol In the first case, the server closes the data connection (if it is open) and responds with a 226 reply, indicating that the abort command was successfully processed. | | | RFC 959 October 1985 File Transfer Protocol The prior existence of a subdirectory with the same name is an error, and the server must return an "access denied" error reply in that case. |
|
http://rfc.sunsite.dk/rfc/rfc959.html
|
|
| |
| | Request for Comments - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia |
| | This is an important early RFC from the IETF that specified the protocol for transferring e-mail messages between computers on the Internet. | | | RFCs can be obtained on the Internet from the RFC Editor [1], the IETF [2], or many other sites, principally using the Web, but also through anonymous FTP, gopher, and other Internet document-retrieval systems. | | | This is an important early RFC from the IETF that specified the format of e-mail messages exchanged between computers on the Internet. |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Request_for_Comments
|
|
| |
| | RFC 2822 (rfc2822) - Internet Message Format |
| | RFC 2822: There is no "To" field required in RFC2822 because the destination is found in... | | | Abstract This standard specifies a syntax for text messages that are sent between computer users, within the framework of "electronic mail" messages. | | | Scope This standard specifies a syntax for text messages that are sent between computer users, within the framework of "electronic mail" messages. |
|
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2822
|
|
| |
| | RFC-Editor Webpage |
| | Memos in the RFC series discuss many aspects of computer networking, including protocols, procedures, programs, and concepts, as well as meeting notes, opinions, and sometimes humor. | | | The RFC Editor also maintains a master file of RFCs called the "RFC Index", which can be | | | As a result, the RFC publication process plays an important role in the |
|
http://www.rfc-editor.org
|
|
| |
| | RFC 2223 - Instructions to RFC Authors. J. Postel, J. Reynolds. |
| | RFC 2223 Instructions to RFC Authors October 1997 Most of the RFCs are processed by the RFC Editor with the unix "nroff" program using a very simple set of the formatting commands (or "requests") from the "ms" macro package (see the Appendix). | | | RFC 2223 Instructions to RFC Authors October 1997 Protocol This protocol is intended to provide the bla-bla service, and be used between clients and servers on host computers. | | | RFC 2223 Instructions to RFC Authors October 1997 For example: On the Assigned Numbers RFCs the term Obsoletes should be used since the new document actually incorporate new information (however brief) into the text of existing information and is more up-to-date than the older document, and hence, replaces it and makes it Obsoletes. |
|
http://rfc.sunsite.dk/rfc/rfc2223.html
|
|
| |
| | The OSU Computer and Information Science Department |
| | This RFC is a commentary on the difficulty of deciding upon an acceptably distinctive hostname for one's computer, a problem which grows in direct proportion to the logarithmically increasing size of the Internet. | | | This informational RFC describes the conventions to be followed by those in charge of networks and hosts in the Internet. | | | This FYI RFC is one of two FYI's called, "Questions and Answers" (Q/A), produced by the User Services Working Group of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). |
|
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/cs/Services/rfc/index.html
|
|
| |
| | RFC Index |
| | For example (Format: TXT=aaaaa, PS=bbbbbb bytes) shows that the ASCII text version is aaaaa bytes, and the PostScript version of the RFC is bbbbbb bytes. | | | Following the RFC number are the title, the author(s), and the publication date of the RFC. | | | Obsoletes xxxx refers to other RFCs that this one replaces; Obsoleted by xxxx refers to RFCs that have replaced this one. |
|
http://www.freesoft.org/CIE/RFC/rfc-ind.cgi
|
|
| |
| | IETF RFC Index - Anne & Lynn Wheeler - 2005/10/12 |
| | RFC text files are now being scanned for References section and the information extracted and presented in manner similar to Updates/UpdatedBy. | | | In the RFC index entries, the author order is not preserved when loading into the database. | | | IETF periodically summarizes the information in a released RFC, also referred to as STD-1. |
|
http://www.garlic.com/~lynn/rfcietf.htm
|
|
| |
| | DNS related RFCs |
| | RFC 1637 (Experimental) obsoletes RFC 1348; obsoleted by RFC 1706 | | | Demotes RFC 2673 and RFC 2874 to Experimental status, as A6 records and binary labels for IPv6 addresses are no longer regarded as important. | | | Policies and procedures for URI.ARPA and URN.ARPA, as used by RFC 3404. |
|
http://www.dns.net/dnsrd/rfc
|
|
| |
| | Internet Relay Chat Protocol |
| | Written in 1994, the CTCP specification follows the original IRC RFC above, and it is the authoritative document for the client-to-client protocol. | | | As defined by FOLDOC, an RFC is an Internet information document or standard. | | | In 2000, these 4 new RFCs were created to address many of the changes that took place since the original was written. |
|
http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/rfc
|
|
| |
| | RFC 1157 (rfc1157) |
| | Two documents were produced to define the management information: RFC 1065, which defined the Structure of Management Information (SMI) [2], and RFC 1066, which defined the Management Information Base (MIB) [3]. | | | Status of this Memo This RFC is a re-release of RFC 1098, with a changed "Status of this Memo" section plus a few minor typographical corrections. | | | Introduction As reported in RFC 1052, IAB Recommendations for the Development of Internet Network Management Standards [1], a two-prong strategy for network management of TCP/IP-based internets was undertaken. |
|
http://www.cse.ohio-state.edu/cgi-bin/rfc/rfc1157.html
|
|
| |
| | [No title] |
| | Standards Track [Page 54] RFC 2616 HTTP/1.1 June 1999 If a resource has been created on the origin server, the response SHOULD be 201 (Created) and contain an entity which describes the status of the request and refers to the new resource, and a Location header (see section 14.30). | | | The syntax and registry of HTTP language tags is the same as that defined by RFC 1766 [1]. | | | The second format is in common use, but is based on the obsolete RFC 850 [12] date format and lacks a four-digit year. |
|
http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616.txt
|
|
| |
| | DewN RFC util |
| | riddlebox:/home/derrick/devel/perl$ rfc rfc v2.22: perl util to search the rfc-index and disply the pages with $viewer usage: rfc # search rfc-index for specified RFC and list topic rfc -d # /path/ (optional) dumps plain text RFC. | | | This tool will allow you to specify a number of an RFC, or a string that you're looking for, and return all related RFC's. | | | It will want to store it in /usr/local/etc/ so you'll need to be root or change $indexpath to a place you can write. |
|
http://www.dewn.com/rfc
|
|
| |
| | RFC.net repository of RFC STD BCP and FYI documents |
| | The process by which an RFC is produced is described in detail in RFC 2026. | | | Further information on the RFC documents and the IETF, the body that produces them, can be had at http://www.rfc-editor.org, the home of the RFC Editor. | | | The Internet Draft is proposed to the IETF, whereupon voting and modification occurs until it either becomes obsolete due to lack of interest or is accepted by the IESG, whereupon it is assigned an RFC number and published as an RFC. |
|
http://www.rfc.net
|
|
| |
| | RFC 1459 |
| | Tatu J. Lund translated the official text file RFC 1459 into this web version, which is mirrored with his permission. | | | There are also other RFC documents including specifications for CTCP, DCC, and the "new" IRC RFCs. | | | Editor's Note: This is the original RFC for IRC. |
|
http://www.irchelp.org/irchelp/rfc/rfc.html
|
|
| |
| | The AtomAPI |
| | What this RFC does specify are the formats of the files that are exchanged and the actions that can be performed on the URIs embedded in those files. | | | Bradner, S. Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997. | | | These can be either full entries, such as a weblog post, or they can be comments, or even a wiki page. |
|
http://bitworking.org/projects/atom/draft-gregorio-09.html
|
|
| |
| | XG RFC's |
| | Comments to the RFCs will be reviewed and then posted to the website for comment by others involved in the RFC review process. | | | DARPA is making these documents available for community input in order to ensure that the resulting XG technology is widely applicable, and so that common principles in terms of policy representation and spectrum user interaction can be developed. | | | Comments will be reviewed and evaluated by the program-internal XG Protocol Working Group as to their appropriateness for inclusion in the RFCs. |
|
http://www.darpa.mil/ato/programs/XG/rfcs.htm
|
|
| |
| | Request for Comments |
| | Search RFC index for a match on number, author, title, and/or keywords. | | | Download the RFC index file (large!) using FTP. | | | Alternative RFC repositories, many with search capability, distributed around the Internet and around the world. |
|
http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc.html
|
|
| |
| | SWITCHmirror - Internet-Drafts & RFC |
| | RFCs are the official document series of the Internet Architecture Board (IAB), and are archived permanently (i.e., they are never deleted, and once an RFC is published, it will never change); however, it is important to note that not all RFCs are standards. | | | There are two types of Internet documents indexed here: Internet-Drafts and Request for Comments (RFCs). | | | Hint: Use more than one word to narrow the search result, e.g 'unicast codec'. |
|
http://mirror.switch.ch/cgi-bin/search/nph-findstd?show_about=yes
|
|
| |
| | IETF RFC Page |
| | where NNNN is the RFC number prefixed with zeroes as necessary to make a four digit number. | | | There is no index or search feature -- those capabilities are available at the RFC Editor Web page. | | | RFCs associated with an active IETF Working Group can also be accessed from the Working Group's web page via IETF Working Groups. |
|
http://www.ietf.org/rfc.html
|
|
| |
| | IETF Request For Comments (RFCs) |
| | Some RFCs are not solid standards, but they nonetheless document technologies that are of great value to the Internet and thus should be used as guidelines for implementing Internet mail programs. | | | The level of standardization that an RFC reaches is determined not only by "how good" the RFC is, but by how widely it is implemented and tested. | | | Many RFCs are the standards on which the Internet is formed. |
|
http://www.imc.org/rfcs.html
|
|
| |
| | RFC: MetaWeblog API |
| | This document was updated on 8/8/03, to incorporate all the RFCs related to the MetaWeblog API. | | | Simple cross-platform distributed computing, based on the standards of the Internet. | | | The earlier version of the document is archived here. |
|
http://www.xmlrpc.com/metaWeblogApi
|
|
| |
| | RFC 2518 |
| | Extension = path ; path is defined in section 3.2.1 of RFC 2068 [RFC2068] | | | Since this augmented BNF uses the basic production rules provided in section 2.2 of [RFC2068], these rules apply to this document as well. | | | The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [RFC2119]. |
|
http://asg.web.cmu.edu/rfc/rfc2518.html
|
|
| |
| | Perl6 RFC Index - perl6 |
| | RFC details by RFC Number can be found here. | | | 202 (v2): Arrays: Overview of multidimensional array RFCs (RFC 203 through RFC 207) [HTML] | | | RFC details by Working Group can be found here. |
|
http://dev.perl.org/rfc
|
|
| |
| | IANA IP Address Services |
| | RFC 3513 - Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) Addressing Architecture | | | RFC 1918 - Address Allocation for Private Internets | | | IANA Report on Recognition of AfriNIC as a Regional Internet Registry (8 April 2005) |
|
http://www.iana.org/ipaddress/ip-addresses.htm
|
|
| |
| | MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) |
| | Conversion of RFC's to HTML based on ASCII versions. | | | MIME Parameter Value and Encoded Word Extensions: Character Sets, Languages, and Continuations | | | The following RFC's define Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions (MIME): |
|
http://www.mhonarc.org/~ehood/MIME/MIME.html
|
|
| |
| | Listing policy for bogusmx.rfc-ignorant.org zone |
| | All MX candidates are considered, and if any of them "fail the test", the domain is listed. | | | Section 10.3 of RFC 2181 points out that pointing an MX RR at a hostname which is actually a CNAME RR is invalid, and such hosts are also listed. | | | RFC 3330, or if the domain contains an MX RR that points to an IP address, in violation of RFC 1035 or if the domain has MX RRs which point to hostnames which themselves do not have an associated A record (including MXs which return an NXDOMAIN, or which are CNAMEs) |
|
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org/policy-bogusmx.php
|
|
| |
| | Request for Comments - a Whatis.com definition - see also: RFC |
| | Change can occur, however, through subsequent RFCs that supersede or elaborate on all or parts of previous RFCs. | | | A Request for Comments (RFC) is a formal document from the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) that is the result of committee drafting and subsequent review by interested parties. | | | RFC is also an abbreviation for Remote Function Call. |
|
http://searchwin2000.techtarget.com/sDefinition/0,,sid1_gci214264,00.html
|
|
| |
| | RFC Main Page |
| | We invite you to learn more about our programs and welcome your support. | | | Contributions to the RFC are tax deductible to the full extent of the law. | | | Contributions to the RFC, a 501 (c) (3) organization, are tax deductible to the full extent of the law. |
|
http://www.rfc.org
|
|
| |
| | RFC (Remote Filesystem Checker) |
| | he would even appreciate a short email with something like "I test RFC on MyBSD and it doesn't work..." | | | Thanks in advance, and come back here to see what's new in future ;-) | | | If you have any suggestion, bug-report, positive/negative comment PLEASE write to the author! |
|
http://rfc.sourceforge.net
|
|
| |
| | RFC-Ignorant.org Home |
| | We document who has chosen not to implement certain protocols described in the RFCs, and provide a means for allowing people to determine for themselves if they wish to communicate with non-compliant systems. | | | It is, of course, up to other sites to decide for themselves whether or not they wish to communicate with sites that have not chosen to implement, say, RFC2142, and have a working "abuse@domain" address. | | | The links to your left under "Listing Policy" detail the criteria for any given zone, and also include the specific RFC numbers that are used for determining the policy contained therein. |
|
http://www.rfc-ignorant.org
|
|
| |
| | Rise From Chaos MUSH - Main Page |
| | How to connect to RfC, and what to do when you get there. | | | Bytes o' Fun, featuring the RFC Gang at their kookiest! | | | Brief profiles of the Staff and long-standing characters. |
|
http://rfc.mushpark.com
|
|
| |
| | IARFC - Registered Financial Consultant - Financial Planner |
| | 38 Proven Ways to Market Your Practice and Increase Sales with Ed Morrow, RFC®, CFP® and Katherine Vessenes, JD, CFP®, RFC® learn more. | | | The Financial Advisor Profiles have been substantially revised. | | | Both events are being held at Caesars Palace in Las Vegas. |
|
http://www.iarfc.org
|
|
|
