SCO v. IBM Linux lawsuit - CompWisdom
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: SCO v. IBM Linux lawsuit


  
 the SCO v IBM info website
SCO has embarked on irrational adventures I can only describe as suicidal, and highly damaging not only to themselves but to businesses that publish and use Unix and Linux on their systems.
IBM announces the release of Journaled File System code for Linux under the GPL.
Aug. 13: SCO announces the revocation of the UNIX license for IBM subsidiary Sequent.
http://sco.iwethey.org

  
 The SCO Group, Inc. SCO Grows Your Business
SCO is the owner of the UNIX Operating System Intellectual Property that dates back to 1969, when the UNIX System was created at AT&T's Bell Laboratories.
End users who purchase this license will be covered for their use of SCO's intellectual property in binary format in Linux distributions on the licensed system.
Many IT users are concerned about using Linux since they have become aware of the allegations that Linux is an unauthorized derivative work of the UNIX®; operating system.
http://www.sco.com/scosource

  
 May 2003 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
IBM Linux lawsuit: Apparently noticing the incongruity of their selling a Linux distribution while suing IBM for stealing their intellectual property and giving it to the developers of that operating system, the SCO Group (formerly Caldera) announces they will no longer distribute Linux.
In spite of personal meetings with Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer and substantial rebates offered on a Microsoft solution, Munich now becomes the largest German city to migrate all of its client PCs to Linux.
Carlos Menem quits the Argentinian presidential race; fellow Peronist Néstor Kirchner is consequently expected to win.
http://www.hartselle.us/project/wikipedia/index.php/May_2003

  
 GROKLAW
SCO and IBM Stipulate to Small Delay on Filings Until Nov. 30 and It Is So Ordered
SCO and IBM Agree on Something: Unsealing Documents
SCO Added to "New Russell Microcap Index" and Some SEC Filings
http://www.groklaw.net/staticpages/index.php?page=20030831173953678

  
 Linux Pipeline News IBM Countersues SCO
The filing, made in the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah, in effect turns the tables on SCO, which in May launched what has become a $5 billion lawsuit against IBM alleging, among other things, that IBM misused and misappropriated SCO-copyrighted Unix System V source code in Linux.
SCO in February dropped its claim that IBM had misappropriated SCO trade secrets, but it continues to insist that IBM is infringing upon SCO's Unix copyrights.
Compare released versions enterprise Linux, the most popular open-source operating system.
http://www.linuxpipeline.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=18900459

  
 SCO
SCO may refer to one of two possible companies:
SCO Group - Company originally known as "Caldera Systems", which acquired several things from Santa Cruz Operation in 2001.
Among those: source code for UNIX, two divisions of the former Santa Cruz Operation, and the "SCO" trademark.
http://www.icyclopedia.com/encyclopedia/s/sc/sco.html

  
 July 2003
Linux advocates react by stating that SCO has no basis for this action, and that doing this may cause SCO to forfeit their rights under the GNU GPL to use or distribute Linux or Linux-derived code in any form.
IBM Linux lawsuit: SCO Group announces that it intends to sell binary-only licences to use the free Linux operating system which will remove the threat of litigation from licence-holders.
World War I Bombing of Dresden California US Constitution Frank Sinatra Boston Marbury v.
http://www.worldhistory.com/wiki/J/July-2003.htm

  
 Someday the mountain might get 'em, but the law never will.
Microsoft was supporting SCO financially so they could continue the case.
Microsoft was worried about Linux, so they sent SCO to go cause them some trouble.
To make it easier to understand, I put it in familiar terms.
http://www.arie.org/doh

Compwisdom
 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 CompWisdom.com Usage implies agreement with terms.