X86-64 - CompWisdom
About us  |  Why use us?  |  Press  |  Contact us

 

Topic: X86-64


  
 X86 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The x86 architecture first appeared inside the Intel 8086 CPU in 1978; the 8086 was a development of the 8008 processor (which itself followed the 4004).
x86 or 80x86 is the generic name of a microprocessor architecture first developed and manufactured by Intel.
The x86 architecture is a CISC design with variable instruction length.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86   (2683 words)

  
 AMD64 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Most likely, the outdated aspects of the x86 instruction set will end up emulated either in processor microcode or by the operating system at some point.
While it was considered at one point RISC chips would inevitably replace the outdated and quirky x86 architecture, in fact AMD64 effectively turns x86 into a modern RISC type programming environment.
It is used by 64 bit Operating Systems; among those that support Long Mode are Linux, the various BSDs, Solaris 10, MenuetOS and Windows XP Professional x64 Edition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64   (1206 words)

  
 www.iGeek.com
The 64 bit extensions basically designed into the ISA from the start, and are not a very radical change to the way things are working.
But it also has this nice 64 bit mode, which is faster still and fixes a few of the problems with IA32 (the old Instruction Set for x86).
Mac users will likely be seeing any benefits from 64 bit computing, far sooner.
http://www.igeek.com/articles/Hardware/Processors/x86-64vPPC-64.txt   (1965 words)

  
 IA-64 - definition of IA-64 in Encyclopedia
Unlike previous Intel x86 processors, the Itanium is not geared toward high performance execution of the IA-32 (x86) instruction set.
In a mainstream "out-of-order" design, a complex decoder system examines each instruction as they flow through the pipeline and sees which can be fed off to operate in parallel across the available execution units — e.g.
Even for this usage, it remains doubtful that IA64 will ever be a commercial success, because 64bit extensions to the x86 architecture are gaining ground in server systems (see below).
http://encyclopedia.laborlawtalk.com/IA-64   (1211 words)

  
 Fedora Core x86-64 Hints 'n' Tips - OSNews.com
In a few years all new computers will be 64 bit.
Microsoft and Intel are positive about the 64 bit direction, and Linux seems to be ahead of Wintel for now.
I think that the binaries are well optimized as there are no such differences as i386, i586, i686.
http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=10123   (406 words)

  
 Geek.com Geek News - Intel reverse-engineered AMD's x86-64 bit instructions
This may be the first time that Intel has choosen to reverse-engineer an AMD technology, since Intel generally prefers to develop new technologies on its own.
It seems you councel that we should not be paying attention to what x86 processor is best for what task, but that all x86 processors are the same and to get the best performance for an application we should be looking at what architecture performs best.
Anywho, x86 is quickly monopolizing the entire range of computer markets, and may well eventually take over, but I doubt it.
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2004Mar/bch20040406024621.htm   (6155 words)

  
 Intel to demonstrate 64-bit x86 "CT" chip in two weeks - Topic Ars OpenForum
Having 64 bit instruction capabilities that are incompatible with the set being used in software in your hardware also doesn't do you much good.
The vast majority of the work Microsoft has to do for their version of Windows with AMD 64 bit instruction support is already completed, with most of the remaining work involving third party hardware manufacturers rewritting their drivers to support the 64 bit extensions.
http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/ubb.x?a=tpc&s=50009562&f=174096756&m=838007322631   (3759 words)

  
 LWN: Debian x86_64 port ready
Your example of a 32 bit program fitting in physical memory, while the 64 bit version not fitting, is exceedingly unlikely.
I use the proprietary 32 bit X server even though my entire desktop and all apps are pure 64 bit.
Yes, /lib is pure 64 bit; there are no 32 bit libraries in there.
http://lwn.net/Articles/89290   (3006 words)

  
 Real World Technologies - AMD's 64 Bit Gamble
Some computer architects lament that the x86 may have forever ruined the reputation of segmented address schemes.
Its early availability, and the existence of a version that supported a low cost 8-bit wide data bus, the 8088, earned it the jackpot of a lifetime design win in the IBM personal computer.
Considering microprocessors, systems, and software, the x86 architecture will probably generate more than a trillion U.S. dollars worth of sales over its eventual lifetime.
http://www.realworldtech.com/page.cfm?ArticleID=RWT071800000000   (510 words)

  
 PCWorld.com - Intel Readies First 64-Bit Chip
EM64T is Intel's name for its 64-bit extensions to the x86 instruction set, a concept pioneered by rival chip maker Advanced Micro Devices.
Back in February, Intel announced that Nocona, code name for the next-generation of the Xeon processor, would be the company's first chip to incorporate EM64T technology.
As AMD worked toward the release of Opteron, Intel shied away from making concrete predictions about its plans for x86 servers with 64-bit extensions, and said 64-bit desktops wouldn't appear until the end of the decade.
http://www.pcworld.com/news/article/0,aid,116631,00.asp   (639 words)

  
 Intel's Otellini drops hints about x86 64-bit chips - Computerworld
Both Opteron and Athlon 64 allow users to run their 32-bit applications on the same computer as their 64-bit applications, and Otellini said that any x86 64-bit Intel technology would come with the same compatibility.
The key question is whether Intel chooses to use the same extensions that AMD has used in the Athlon 64 and Opteron chips, or if it goes down a different path.
With Opteron gaining the support of IBM and Sun Microsystems Inc. last year, and possibly Hewlett-Packard Co. this week, anticipation is mounting that Intel will finally acknowledge the arrival of that x86 64-bit market with demonstrations or announcements of a chip bearing that technology.
http://www.computerworld.com/printthis/2004/0,4814,89549,00.html   (608 words)

  
 AMD and Intel Largely in Harmony on x86-64
Near-100% software compatibility is possible, but in some cases, programs written for one 64-bit architecture may not run properly on the other 64-bit architecture.
Memory-addressing schemes and many other architectural features, such as data-addressing modes, context-switching behavior, interrupt handling, and support for existing 16- and 32-bit x86 execution modes were also compared.
In other cases, software can easily adapt to the differences by executing slightly different code, after first probing the CPU to learn which 64-bit extensions it supports.
http://www.instat.com/pr/2004/mpr_4_5_04.asp   (584 words)

  
 Intel® Extended Memory 64 Technology (EM64T)
Intel Extended Memory 64 Technology (Intel EM64T) is a feature of to Intel's computing architecture that enables the desktop processor platform to access larger amounts of memory.
Intel®; Extended Memory 64 Technology is one of a number of innovations added to Intel's Server/Workstation platforms.
With appropriate 64-bit supporting hardware and software, platforms based on an Intel processor supporting Intel EM64T can enable use of extended virtual and physical memory.
http://www.intel.com/technology/64bitextensions   (503 words)

  
 [No title]
Programmers, analysts, architecture buffs, and enthusiasts often see x86 as a leaden albatross around the neck of the entire computing industry, and like the Mariner's albatross we were all hoping it would just fall off at some point and slip quietly into the deep.
As we'll see, x86-64 is more than just a 64-bit extension to the 32-bit x86 ISA; it adds some new features, as well, while getting rid of some obsolete ones.  Note that this article deals with the x86-64 ISA only.
Also, don't take the instruction and code "sizes" too literally, since they're intended to convey a general feel for what it means to "widen" a processor from 32 bits to 64 bits.  You should notice that not all of the data in either memory, the cache, or the registers is 64-bit data.
http://pages.prodigy.net/jcusto/bin/pcrepair/cpus/Intro64bitcpu.doc   (5844 words)

  
 Sudhian Media
Except for all the doomsday predictions, Intel hasn’t budged on its commitment to the CPU design.
Software vendors and companies that were on the fence over supporting x86-64 might now decide to do so knowing that Intel is onboard.
Turn the clock ahead and its launch time for Nocona with support for what Intel is called EM64T, or Extended Memory 64 Technology.
http://www.sudhian.com/showdocs.cfm?aid=564   (679 words)

  
 X-bit labs - Hardware news - Intel Confirms and Denies x86-64 Processors.
This is not the first indication of a 64-bit x86 design from Intel, though, this time all information comes from Intel’s official PR people, not analysts or sources close to the company.
Although support for 64-bit extensions may not provide a staggering boost in performance of AMD processors at first, the chip is likely to become a good seller for the Sunnyvale, California-based CPU maker, and, after it substitutes the Athlon XP chips, will hold about 20% market share for AMD.
Given the fact that specially developed and optimised software is needed for Itanium and Itanium 2 chips to show all their power, some customers keep away from those CPUs because they still need to run demanding software compatible only with x86.
http://www.xbitlabs.com/news/cpu/display/20031227163600.html   (905 words)

  
 OpenVMS on HP Integrity servers
The x86 with 64-bit extensions would be good for this, rather than more expensive Itanium-based systems.
About 20 of these vendors are delivering up to dual processor systems; about 20 are delivering up to 4-processor systems, and at least10 of these vendors are delivering servers up to 128P processors.
Therefore customers will be free to make their choices based on the job to be done rather than price Indeed, many shops will use a larger OpenVMS server for development thus allowing large numbers of development projects to occur on the same system simultaneously.
http://h71000.www7.hp.com/openvms/integrity/faqs2.html   (2151 words)

  
 Neowin.net - Intel secret X86-64 project still on the go
It is said that AMD's new 64 bit instruction set is a superset of the x86 instruction set, which means it will add more hardware level functions available which may mean things like hardware division may be available and other bells and whistles while maintaining compatibility of the base x86 functions.
One of the reasons Intel probably wanted to abandon the x86 instruction sets with the Itanic is because the x86 architecture is a nightmare, to be blunt.
Also, as a sidenote, x86 refers to a set of hardware specific functions used in low level programming languages such as Assembler.
http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?id=9829&category=main   (1596 words)

  
 ITworld.com - HP sees demand for 64-bit x86 servers
It uses a different instruction set from the x86 instruction set found in most of the world's PCs and low-end servers, which means that applications developed for x86 systems are incompatible with the Itanium processor.
Opteron features 64-bit extensions to the x86 instruction set that increase the amount of memory the processor is able to address.
Itanium is designed to replace the RISC (reduced instruction set computing) chips such as Sun's UltraSparc or IBM's Power 4 that run high-end servers for corporate databases or complex high-performance computing tasks, Haff said.
http://www.itworld.com/Comp/1361/040128hpx86   (965 words)

  
 Speculation on Intel's 64-bit X86 plans
The Inquirer - Xeon 64 versus Opteron 64?
Though it's the x86 expert, Intel would need time to ramp up to make the chip and the things that go with it, such as circuit boards and chipsets.
Robert McMillan of IDG News Service has an enlightening interview with Gordon Moore, co-founder of Intel and creator of "Moore's Law", regarding the future of the X86 architecture.
http://www.davidst.com/pentium64   (3422 words)

  
 UNIX on the x86-64 laptop
Yes, this is 64 bits, and the performance obtained will blow away anything the XP users can achieve.
The Athlon64 boasts features such as a 1 MB L2 cache, and a dual-channel 1.6 GHz replacement for the frontside bus known as HyperTransport.
Had to copy SUSE 2.4 x86-64 includes over the SUSE 2.4 kernel source tree
http://www.eccentrix.com/members/mammon/x86_64   (1025 words)

  
 Neowin.net - Intel confirms existence of X86-64 Yamhill chip
The Intel 32-bit/64-bit hybrid CPU is 100% compatible to x86-64 (Athlon 64) and therefore can use the 64-bit version of Windows for Athlon 64s.
MS would never make yet another 64-bit version of Windows, in fact they would have even not started coding the Athlon 64 version of their OS if they didn't know that Intel would also develop a x86-64 CPU.
It seems to me that this was what the long delay in releasing Windows Xp 64 bit edition is all about.
http://www.neowin.net/comments.php?category=main&id=16170   (2225 words)

  
 Comments for: Intel could adopt 64-bit x86 - ja.zz
It would be a major victory for AMD if Intel didn't adopt x86 64-bit computing.
Whan all these 64 bit CPU's come out, is Microsoft going to make Windows for AMD64, Windows for Intel64.
Given all of the software that's out there, x86 64-bit processors do make sense.
http://techreport.com/ja.zz?comments=5997&page=1   (1319 words)

  
 Gates calls for 64-bit software support CNET News.com
Even if most PC users are still a couple years away from running 64-bit operating systems on their desktop, Microsoft needs hardware makers to start moving now, says independent technology analyst Peter Glaskowsky.
For its part, Microsoft has been slower than it originally planned in delivering a version of Windows XP that runs on 64-bit x86 processors.
Applications written to take advantage of 64-bit computing won't work in Windows unless the drivers are also 64-bit, Glaskowsky said, adding that a lack of drivers could well be a "gating factor" that keeps people from moving to 64 bit programs.
http://news.com.com/2100-1001_3-5205806.html   (904 words)

  
 Intel cribbed x86-64 tech 'from AMD documents' The Register
"We've tested the Intel x86 64-bit stuff, and it works for OpenBSD," said one of the OS development team.
It also compared the memory-addressing schemes and many other architectural features, such as data-addressing modes, context-switching behavior, interrupt handling, and support for existing 16- and 32-bit x86 execution modes.
Intel developed its 64-bit extensions to the 32-bit x86 instruction set by "reading AMD's pre-release documentation", Microprocessor Report analyst Tom Halfhill has claimed.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/04/07/intel_64bit   (341 words)

  
 The Tech Report - Comments on AMD announces x86-64 Linux support and more
The first of the two concerns support for AMD's 64-bit extensions to the x86 ISA, x86-64, in version 2.6 of the Linux kernel.
But, that's assuming a RISC architecture with fixed length instructions, something x86 doesn't have.
AMD continues its week-long guerrilla campaign to steal some of the limelight from the Intel Developer's Forum.
http://techreport.com/news_reply.x/3440   (1122 words)

  
 LinuxQuestions.org - X86 or X86_64? - where Linux users come for help
I too understand the difference between 32-bit and 64-bit OS's, what I was trying to ask is how do the Debian based ones perform.
I've been using the 32-bit version on my current machine without much trouble (except for not being able to turn on DMA with my DVD burner).
I understand that the 32-bit version will run fine on Athlon 64.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?threadid=362845   (816 words)

  
 Geek.com Geek News - Intel's Yamhill Technology: x86-64 compatible
Yamhill Technology, as it is being called, apparently will be embedded in future Intel x86 chips in 2003 or 2004, with the option to turn it on or off.
The Yamhill should be just a workaround to wait for that "crossover point" on the performance curvesbetween Intel's 32 and 64 bit chips.
He theorized, and had it on fairly reliable insider information, that Intel has been working on an x86-64 compatible architecture for a while now.
http://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2002jan/bch20020125009966.htm   (1944 words)

  
 Intel will Eat Crow and Support AMD's x86-64 :: osViews osOpinion :: Tech Opinions for the People, by the People
Now, Intel has obviously been watching this develop (it's not like the Opteron dropped out of the blue) and there were rumors several years ago of Intel working on 64bit extensions to the x86 ISA (the so-called "Yamhill" technology).
It seems more likely to me that they long ago got sick of the x86 ISA millstone hanging around their neck: all the clever engineering that has gone into making the creaky register-deprived CISCesque x86 run like a massively-registered RISC could've been spent on so many other things.
History would have been very different if they just done a state of the art RISC implementation with some instructions for speeding up software emulation of x86 programs.
http://www.osviews.com/modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid=146&mode=thread&order=0&thold=0   (2382 words)

  
 PCWorld.com - Intel Joins the 64-Bit Desktop Fray
This slightly higher rated 2.4-GHz Athlon 64 bested the P4 in WorldBench tests in normal 32-bit Windows XP Professional by three points, but on Windows XP Professional X64 Edition, the Intel chip closed the gap considerably.
For competition's sake, we also put an Athlon 64 3800+ processor through the rigors of our WorldBench 5 benchmark suite.
PC World put one of the new processors to the test, benchmarking a 3.6-GHz EM64T Pentium 4 while running both the 32-bit version of Windows XP Professional and Release Candidate 2 of the 64-bit Windows XP Professional X64 Edition.
http://www.pcworld.com/resource/article/0,aid,119739,pg,1,RSS,RSS,00.asp   (636 words)

  
 Linux: AMD vs Intel "x86-64"
I read that Microsoft told intel they weren't going to support to x86 64 bit instruction sets and Microsoft also told intel they were already going with AMD.
One rumour I've heard is that MS sat Intel down and told them that if their new 64 bit extensions were not compatible with AMD's then they were not going to port their code to it.
called an x86 anything but x86, and Intel is just making it worse by
http://kerneltrap.org/node/view/2466   (4042 words)

  
 sandpile.org -- The world's leading source for pure technical x86 processor information.
The world's leading source for pure technical x86 processor information.
sandpile.org -- The world's leading source for pure technical x86 processor information.
http://www.sandpile.org   (22 words)

  
 Using the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC)
-Os), in which case the default is the minimum correct alignment (4 bytes for x86, and 8 bytes for x86-64).
The 64-bit environment sets int to 32 bits and long and pointer to 64 bits and generates code for AMD's x86-64 architecture.
See X86 Built-in Functions, for details of the functions enabled and disabled by these switches.
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-3.2/gcc/i386-and-x86-64-Options.html   (1431 words)

  
 AMD, Intel Prime New x86 64-bit Chips
The chip war between Intel (Quote, Chart) and AMD (Quote, Chart) is heating up Monday with the release of competing x86 64-bit processors.
revealed that it would produce 64-bit software extensions for its Pentium and Xeon processor family that the x86 64-bit market really turned into a real horse race.
ON-DEMAND WEBCAST: Helping Ensure a Secure Computing Environment Using Effective Patch Management--Learn how effective patch management can help ensure that your computers remain secure and available.
http://www.internetnews.com/ent-news/article.php/3482746   (1257 words)

  
 [Users] compiling with MPI on x86_64
============================================= which says that ifc 8.1.023 compiles 64 bit and i have 8.1.018, so i should upgrade, and that may solve it.
Alternatively you might want to use > the intel C compiler.
>> >>> >>> Could you try 'file' on one of your mpich libraries too, just to see >>> if they have been compiled 64 or 32 bit - I would assume from the >>> library directory that they are 64 bit.
http://www.cactuscode.org/pipermail/users/2004-November/000345.html   (513 words)

  
 LWN: Linuxant adds native 64-bit (x86_64) support to DriverLoader
The x86_64 architecture (also referred to as AMD64 or EM64T by Intel) is a set of evolutionary processor extensions that define the basis of the 64-bit computing infrastructure on x86 platforms.
DriverLoader is a revolutionary compatibility-wrapper allowing standard Windows NDIS (Network Driver Interface Specification) drivers shipped by hardware vendors to be used as-is on Linux x86 systems.
This makes DriverLoader the world's first and only available solution (at the time of this writing) to operate 802.11g Wireless LAN interfaces based on widespread Broadcom chipsets under 64-bit Linux kernels.
http://lwn.net/Articles/118269   (2227 words)

  
 x86 64-Bit Server Space Heats Up
Although it has pledged support for AMD's and Intel's processors, Microsoft Corp. has delayed the release of a 64-bit Windows until next year.
Whether you run or walk to this technology, however, depends on your industry and organizational needs.
Although applications such as those for scientific research, high-end databases and digital-media creation can take advantage of the new hardware, few mainstream applications support 64-bit address spaces, and Linux is the only operating system currently supporting 64 bits.
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,1634073,00.asp   (879 words)

  
 AMD64 Subpage
Here's what all you kernel hackers have dreamed of: an x86 system simulator running under GNU/Linux!
The simulated system contains an AMD64 technology-enabled chip, RAM, disks, and VGA.
Please report bugs via the AMD64.org bug tracking system.
http://www.x86-64.org/downloads   (176 words)

  
 VMTN Discussion Forums: x86-64 ...
so it should be OK to use x86 code in an x86_64 kernel module [based on the x86_64 ISA, where the REX prefix is needed to access a good deal of the 64-bit stuff].
In AMD64 Linux, you can supposedly run x86 binaries in the 64-bit OS.
I think the VMWare kmods just use the arch description to set up inline asm, task switching, and so on...
http://www.vmware.com/community/thread.jspa?threadID=1437&messageID=5602   (1182 words)

  
 FedoraForum.org - Arg! - Problems with FC3 x86_64 not detecting hardware
I started seeing problems when the installer couldn't detect my monitor (where the x86 version did).
I can't seem to find what's failing and why this works fine in x86 and not x86_64.
I loaded fc3 x86 on an MSI K8N Neo2 (AMD64) system and everything was going fine until I realized that I really should have loaded the x86_64 version of fc3.
http://www.fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?t=33010   (324 words)

  
 Reference - Technical Articles & Tips
The AMD64 ABI (Application Binary Interface) is evolved from the 32-bit x86 ABI.
Sun Studio software features already available on Solaris OS SPARC platforms are now available on Solaris OS x86 based systems, for both 32-bit and 64-bit applications.
The Solaris 10 OS on x86 platforms not only provides 64-bit addressing, but also improved performance for many 32-bit applications when they are recompiled.
http://developers.sun.com/prodtech/cc/reference/techart   (1586 words)

  
 x86-64 - TechSpot OpenBoards
I've just finished an interesting article here, which details AMD's plans to extend the x86 ISA to 64 bits.
Cherry OS Claims Mac OS X Capability For x86
Without getting too technical, the article does give a quick and easy breakdown on exactly why a 64-bit x86 processor would be better, why it can address more RAM than a 32bit chip, why 64 bits and what exactly a 64-bit processor is, anyway.
http://www.techspot.com/vb/topic4623.html   (321 words)

  
 AnandTech: AMD’s Voyage into the 64-bit Arena: x86-64 Revealed
With IA-64, Intel is promising to be free of the shackles that the x86 ISA has placed on their CPUs for over 2 decades, but in doing that, they are also flushing the idea of high performing backwards compatibility with older IA-32 applications.
You can't say that AMD hasn't come a long way from the time when their flagship processor was the K6.
If you look around the microprocessor industry, especially at those companies that already have 64-bit parts available, Intel's strategy for IA-64 isn't all that extreme.
http://www.anandtech.com/showdoc.html?i=1295   (609 words)

  
 LinuxQuestions.org - AMD64 (x86_64) and Flash - where Linux users come for help
I ended up getting mplayerplug-in working by using the dag yum package repository and doing a yum install mplayer.i386 (I used the i386 version of the dag repository instead of x86_64) and that installed 32 bit mplayer and all the 32 bit libraries it depended on, except one, libxmms.
I ended up switching to the 32 bit version of firefox, then just the automatic flash installer worked fine.
However, I also wanted mplayerplug-in so I could watch realvideo, realaudio, quicktime, wmv, microsoft streams; it turns out if you compile mplayer for 64 bit linux it does not support the win32 codecs (necessary for a lot of quicktime/real/microsoft formats); I couldn't figure out how to compile a 32 bit mplayer on 64 bit fedora.
http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?s=&threadid=267001   (822 words)

  
 AMD ships Linux 64-bit Hammer x86-64 simulator The Register
AMD has released its Linux-based 'Hammer Sim' - a simulator that allows developers to run and debug code written for Chimpzilla's upcoming x86-64 64-bit processor technology.
- available free from AMD's Web site - lets coders test their software on a regular 32-bit x86 CPU.
AMD's Hammer family of chips, the successors to Sledgehammer, will be unveiled in full at the end of 2001.
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2000/10/14/amd_ships_linux_64bit_hammer   (318 words)

  
 Articles - Central processing unit
Higher levels of integer precision require more structures to deal with the additional digits, and therefore more complexity, size, power usage, and generally expense.
The simpler microcontrollers are usually cheaper, use less power, and therefore dissipate less heat, all of which can be major design considerations for electronic devices.
It is not at all uncommon, therefore, to see 4 or 8 bit microcontrollers used in modern applications, even though CPUs with much higher precision (such as 16, 32, 64, even 128 bit) are available.
http://www.seekj.com/articles/Central_processing_unit   (3097 words)

  
 AnandTech News: Mandrakelinux 10.1 for x86-64 is released
AMD Athlon 64, AMD Opteron, Intel Xeon 64, Intel EM64T.
Mandrakelinux 10.1 for x86-64 can be pre-ordered now from
http://www.anandtech.com/news/shownews.aspx?i=23359   (584 words)

  
 LinuxHardware.org ATI Rleases New Drivers! X86_64 Now Available!
ATI Proprietary Linux x86 Driver - Version: 8.8.25
If you're an ATI user, please comment on how these new drivers work for you.
http://www.linuxhardware.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/17/2159253   (370 words)

  
 Slashdot NetBSD Ported to AMD x86-64 (Sledgehammer)
Transmeta, which has a soft architecture, ought to be able to convert their code morpher to process the AMD 64-bit instruction set, which is basically x86 with longer words.
This would be useful mostly as a test environment until AMD gets the real machine out the door.
http://slashdot.org/bsd/01/06/22/192225.shtml   (1116 words)

  
 Linux: 2.4.29-pre3, x86-64 Security Fix
Once again, I may be wrong, but I really don't understand at all then.
Although I don't know about x86_64 assembly, I know x86 and I wonder
> Although I don't know about x86_64 assembly, I know x86 and I wonder
http://kerneltrap.org/node/4445   (866 words)

Compwisdom
 About us   |  Why use us?   |  Press   |  Contact us

 Copyright © 2006 CompWisdom.com Usage implies agreement with terms.